Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
...Wife away for night. Work finished. 4 DVDs to watch. 8 cans and 4 bottles of ale in the Fridge. Take-away Chinese already delivered.
Wish me luck...
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 15:33, 21 replies, latest was 17 years ago)
...my Brute is Lvl 8, what level are you, Mastah?
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 15:38, Reply)
But I need more info. What DVDs are they and what are you having from the Chinese?
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 15:48, Reply)
And ale? You can't go wrong with a bottle or 2 of Old Tom!
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:00, Reply)
Though you might start to go a little wrong after 3 or 4 of 'em...
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:33, Reply)
I thought there was always strippers when the wifey is away.
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:02, Reply)
You could watch this therefore having a DVD to watch and strippers to admire!
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:08, Reply)
Not seen that!
Agnostic Antichrist and his housemate have my copy of Zombie Strippers. I'm hoping they wipe the cover clean before returning it.
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:12, Reply)
...all they'd be doing is putting me to bed!
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:43, Reply)
A takeaway curry and a couple of bottles of sangiovese, or possibly a trip to the curry house and wine after. It's a tricky one.
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:22, Reply)
...so here's the answers:
Solaris (Clooney version)
Robot Chicken Series 1
Frost / Nixon (History junkie)
Eagle Eye (inexcusable, really, so let the insults begin)
8 cans Fosters, Ale = Wold Top (golden ale), Black Cat (kind of a Stout / Mild), 2 Spire ales (both Bitter)
Salt and Pepper Chicken
Roast pork Belly
Singapore Vermicelli
Come to daddy...!
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:30, Reply)
by Moorhouse?
Lovely stuff, that is. (Mild, I believe)
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:33, Reply)
Chinese food is about 17 different kinds of ace. Sweet and sour pork cantonese style is just soooooo good.
(, Wed 27 May 2009, 16:38, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »