Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(
rob, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest,
837,
836,
835,
834,
833, ...
1
« Go Back |
See The Full Thread
Weep, contenders.
I am starting out from Temple.
(
thealternativefact, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:35,
1 reply,
17 years ago)
Fiendish opening gambit there, Clenders.
I'll start out just over the river, at Waterloo.
(
Slip Digby is a meat puppet, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:42,
Reply)
I prefer to start a little further out
Hornchurch.
Not just a move, it's a way of life.
(
The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:46,
Reply)
Very smooth...
I think I'm forced to Osterley at this point.
(
thealternativefact, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:51,
Reply)
Slipping this in in Kings Rules
Hounslow east.
(
Potty Jag har smör i min rumpspringa, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:47,
Reply)
Oh sneaky! That's the way it is, eh?
Well in
that case...
Croxley!
Ha!
(
thealternativefact, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:50,
Reply)
Damn you!
Right - gloves off. Kings Cross.
(
Potty Jag har smör i min rumpspringa, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:51,
Reply)
*shrieks*
YOU DIDN'T?
Warren Street. WARREN STREET!
(
thealternativefact, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:52,
Reply)
Right. If that's the way we're playing this, I'm using the Mornington Croissant
CHALK FARM, BITCHES.
(
Slip Digby is a meat puppet, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:03,
Reply)
I hate to be a pedant,
But surely under the 1884 Half-Scrotum ban, a move to Chalk farm is technicaly illegal, seeing as someone has already played Kings Cross?
(
Fredz A graveyard of hopes, a dump of ambition, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:06,
Reply)
Not if a Mornington Croissant is played in conjunction with the Seventh Reflex Oeuf Parabola.
(
Slip Digby is a meat puppet, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:06,
Reply)
Yes, but under the 1885 Half Scrotum ban clarification
The Seventh reflex Oeuf parabola loophole can't be played in conjunction with a Mornington Croissant, with the exeption (of course) of Elephant and Castle and Lamberth Way. I mean, the 1885 clarification was mostly concerned with closing that little loophole, after the controversy of the 1884 christmas tournament.
(
Fredz A graveyard of hopes, a dump of ambition, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:11,
Reply)
In that case, you'd expect the succeeding playr to miss a turn, or go on strike.
However, given the nastiness of December 1884, I shall bow down to this one, gracefully. I find myself in Nidd.
(
Slip Digby is a meat puppet, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:15,
Reply)
I salute your good sportsmanship sir
December 1884 was nasty indeed. Some harsh words where exchanged. Nidd huh? Given that move I'm going to go for Clerkenwell Road.
(
Fredz A graveyard of hopes, a dump of ambition, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:21,
Reply)
« Go Back |
See The Full Thread
Pages: Latest,
837,
836,
835,
834,
833, ...
1