b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 452237 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

Because ISIHAC is back tonight, and in the true spirit of Humph...
Let's have a right-royal rollicking round of Mornington Crescent. Please, remember that the 1884 Half-Scrotum is banned at present.

You go first, I am chair.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:02, 39 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Mornington Crescent

(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:03, Reply)
I say, that's just not cricket, old boy.

(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:03, Reply)
Sorry can't talk,
I'm doing a victory lap of the building.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:05, Reply)
Can't run and talk?
Very b3tan of you.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:54, Reply)
Easy one to start with, although it exposes the diagonals
Birdcage Walk.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:15, Reply)
Hmmm. I'll play it safe I think.
Kings road.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:16, Reply)
is this game
like zen risk?

if so im invading Kamkatchka with 7 from Western europe
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:21, Reply)
The Embankment
which, I believe under Huffington's second manouvre, may well land you in early knip
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:22, Reply)
Curses!
Okay, that doesn't leave me with a good opening. Hrm. Okay, I think I might regret this, but - Blackfriars road.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:24, Reply)
right back at ya with Charing Cross Road

(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:25, Reply)
Are we allowing the 1964 diagonal cross rules?
If so, I play Kennington park road.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:27, Reply)
It's the offshoot from the original 1864 Stovold rules, which is virtually identical to the modern game,
except is only allows disgonals from Paddington if the previous player ended up in Spoon by their third move
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:28, Reply)
Oh, well that rather invalidates my last move....
Hrm. I'm going to go for Blackheath hill in that case then.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:31, Reply)
Can I go Chancery Lane now or am I blocked under the Farringdon Lemma?
As I recall there was some dispute.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:26, Reply)
That was resolved under Poole's third ruling.
Leicester Square.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:33, Reply)
Weep, contenders.
I am starting out from Temple.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:35, Reply)
Fiendish opening gambit there, Clenders.
I'll start out just over the river, at Waterloo.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:42, Reply)
I prefer to start a little further out
Hornchurch.

Not just a move, it's a way of life.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:46, Reply)
Very smooth...
I think I'm forced to Osterley at this point.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:51, Reply)
Slipping this in in Kings Rules
Hounslow east.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:47, Reply)
Oh sneaky! That's the way it is, eh?
Well in that case...
Croxley!
Ha!
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:50, Reply)
Damn you!
Right - gloves off. Kings Cross.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:51, Reply)
*shrieks*
YOU DIDN'T?
Warren Street. WARREN STREET!
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:52, Reply)
Right. If that's the way we're playing this, I'm using the Mornington Croissant
CHALK FARM, BITCHES.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:03, Reply)
I hate to be a pedant,
But surely under the 1884 Half-Scrotum ban, a move to Chalk farm is technicaly illegal, seeing as someone has already played Kings Cross?
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:06, Reply)
Not if a Mornington Croissant is played in conjunction with the Seventh Reflex Oeuf Parabola.

(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:06, Reply)
Yes, but under the 1885 Half Scrotum ban clarification
The Seventh reflex Oeuf parabola loophole can't be played in conjunction with a Mornington Croissant, with the exeption (of course) of Elephant and Castle and Lamberth Way. I mean, the 1885 clarification was mostly concerned with closing that little loophole, after the controversy of the 1884 christmas tournament.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:11, Reply)
In that case, you'd expect the succeeding playr to miss a turn, or go on strike.
However, given the nastiness of December 1884, I shall bow down to this one, gracefully. I find myself in Nidd.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:15, Reply)
I salute your good sportsmanship sir
December 1884 was nasty indeed. Some harsh words where exchanged. Nidd huh? Given that move I'm going to go for Clerkenwell Road.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:21, Reply)
ooooh!
Great, good thing you said something, for some reason I thought it was on friday.
Oh, Victoria.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:48, Reply)
Hmmm...
I'm playin' the long-game.
It'll get you in the end though.
Kinda like AIDS.

Saaaaf Woodford.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:55, Reply)
Station circle
Marylebone - Waterloo - Victoria.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 13:59, Reply)
I have no idea what that means.
Also, I have no idea what this game is.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:01, Reply)
Mong.

(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:02, Reply)
Damn right!

Oh, go look at the thread I just posted!
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:03, Reply)
Interrupting a rubber of MC in progress to shop your thread?
You couldn't have been more offensive if you'd played Goodge Street.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:14, Reply)
I always thought Mornington crescent was the stiffy guys got when they woke up : /

(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:15, Reply)
MADAM, YOU SULLY OUR GAME.
I BITE MY THUMB AT YOU.

Ow, that really hurt.
(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:24, Reply)
That Mornington Crescent always makes me laugh.

(, Mon 15 Jun 2009, 14:24, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1