
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

advanced vivisection techniques with taxidermy?
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:05, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

do they know what they are letting themselves in for?
actually, as much as it pains me to say it, I suspect that you'd probably be a very good teacher.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:18, Reply)

But the poor kids will have a load of made up shit in their heads to go with the real stuff he's taught them!
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:23, Reply)

which is more than can be said for a bunch of teachers these days.
my gf's sister is an A-level physics teacher, and I've had to explain to her why things float. I despair.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:24, Reply)

And his made up shit sounds plausible enough that most people don't realise anyway.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:26, Reply)

I had a shit Biology teacher at A level, and it almost put me off the subject forever.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:35, Reply)

fortunately by not listening to them and not doing any work I ended up with some A-levels and a high quality engineering degree. no thanks to them.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:39, Reply)

Most of my teachers were excellent, just one of my biology ones was terrible.
I got shit A-Levels though, as I was a fuckin' waster at the time.
Got into uni on my interview.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:43, Reply)

This is significantly crap compared to what I should've got =[
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:49, Reply)

I got BCD, which scraped me onto the course, and most of my coursemates had all As. Didn't stop them being pretty dumb though.
I came to the conclusion a while ago that exams are a very shit way of testing people.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 11:56, Reply)

I got AABB and then a first in my BSc, so exams were an excellent way of testing me.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 12:00, Reply)

Using exams to measure aptitude might benefit you greatly but that doesn't mean they're a great way of measuring your aptitude.
Sure you might be relatively worse off if a method of testing that has stronger correlation between indicated performance and actual performance were introduced but it'd still be a better way of testing you.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 12:10, Reply)

And a 2 on the Chemistry Special paper. But then I only got a 2-2 for my degree. I suspect the introduction of serious quantities of alcohol may have played a part in this dramatic slide.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 12:07, Reply)

I was lucky that only Oxford needed good grades to get in (I think it was AAB at the time) and Cardiff only wanted BBB. It still surprised me that I was one of the most capable students there (especially given the episodes I was having at the time).
I say it all the time; I'd love to go back. It'll be very hard to choose between chemistry and a computing based degree though.
( , Fri 3 Jul 2009, 12:02, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread