I suspect it's more along the lines of
Gordon Brown has slightly scrawly handwriting, and a Sun reader can't... er... read.

Remember that the Sun is aimed slightly below the UK average reading-age. And the UK average reading age is 12; and almost a quarter of adults have a level of literacy at or below that expected of an 11-year-old.

EDIT: But I did not have any sex, fantastic or otherwise. Meh.
( Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 9:21, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

I'm CONDFOOSED
The average reading age is 12, yet most adults have the reading ability of an 11 year old?
( Bert Monkeysex is waiting for the mods to delete him, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 9:24, Reply)

No - almost a quarter.
And even if it was most, as long as there were some with a STUPENDOUS reading-age, that'd drag up the average.
( Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 9:29, Reply)

No
that would drag up the mean. The term average is fairly meaningless unless you define how you calculate it. It's this confusion that lets papers make bold statements, such as about house prices, which although correct, are not applicable to what most people would think it means.
( Bazongaloid, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 9:32, Reply)

if you start saying root mean square
people are going to get confused
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 9:34, Reply)

Root mean square!
*runs away in the confusion*
( Bazongaloid, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 9:34, Reply)

Fair enough.
I don't know what's the most depressing interpretation of "average" here: neither the mean, median nor mode is exactly inspiring.
( Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 9:47, Reply)

OI BERT!
I'm ready and waiting where's my pictures of the mens bogs!
( Peej, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 9:51, Reply)

Ah, shit
I'll pop home at lunch to get my phone's USB lead, take pictures of the Men's room, and turn you on like a big gayer
( Bert Monkeysex is waiting for the mods to delete him, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 10:00, Reply)

WOOYAY!
*faps*
( Peej, Mon 9 Nov 2009, 10:10, Reply)