Why Not?
I would recommend having a look at the US secret services record of evidence tampering in order to convict the man they want to.

Paul Foot wrote many articles uncovering many flaws in trials.
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Fri 27 Nov 2009, 8:37, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

Wai nought?
Just because a man wrote some articles doesn't make it explicit he won't get a fair trial.
( Noeli overtheshoulderboulderholderthingstraplatchboobs, Fri 27 Nov 2009, 8:39, Reply)

I agree
They have form is all I am saying.
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Fri 27 Nov 2009, 8:48, Reply)

Fair enough.
I find rash and possibly misinformed sweeping opinions amusing.
( Noeli overtheshoulderboulderholderthingstraplatchboobs, Fri 27 Nov 2009, 8:53, Reply)

It is a rash and sweeping thought
I don't think that any person who has a trial where intelligence communities are involved will get a fair one! It's the nature of keeping secrets - people will want it kept a secret, so will do what they can to keep it a secret.

It's not based on any fact or research, this is just my opinion.
(Potty Jag har smör i min rumpspringa, Fri 27 Nov 2009, 8:55, Reply)

Isnt that possibly
A rash sweeping opinion in itself?








*wonders if bait will be taken*
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Fri 27 Nov 2009, 8:59, Reply)

Ask yourself if you're sure who's taken what bait.

( Noeli overtheshoulderboulderholderthingstraplatchboobs, Fri 27 Nov 2009, 9:00, Reply)

Aha
Who is more foolish the fool or the fool who fools the fool...

etc ad infinitum
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Fri 27 Nov 2009, 9:06, Reply)