Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
She laughs hysterically to herself first. Then shakes her head. Then says "Honestly, ooooh, hahahah!" Cue more head-shaking.
I never take the bait but she launches into it anyway "Oooh, our Cockwipe, he's such a case he really is..."
Then proceeds to tell me he's bought a new flash car or got a new job or whatever. None of these things could ever be taken as amusing, but she's too self-conscious to openly brag. She pretends to think it's funny so she can tell me.
I hate it. Just boast, you stupid old cunt.
She was also telling me on Friday that she psychically knows that John Venables has stabbed someone who knows his true identity. "Because the evil is right IN him, Roota!"
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 10:43, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
"oh my god somEthing bad will happen"
*knocks over paperclip pot*
"OH MY GOD THE END IS NIGH"
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 10:54, Reply)
somewhere out the way of your typing area.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 10:57, Reply)
and have decided that the public have the right to know everything he has ever done. I'm not saying he's a nice guy, but Jamies Bulgars mum needs to cheer up a bit, she always looks a right sour faced cow. It's been almost twenty years, I'm over my dog dying and that's only been about 10 years.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 10:47, Reply)
has joined a Facebook group entitled "John Venables raped his own child and that's why he's back in prison".
With the subtext "The Sun aren't allowed to tell you this."
Mind you, when she was a kid she was part of the baying mob who screamed obscenities at a kid who was hauled in for questioning and had nothing to do with it.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 10:50, Reply)
who would do worse than him if they thought they could get away with it. Bunch of cunts the lot of them. I remember when the Daily Star had it's "Name and Shame" campaign for peados and they put someones photo on the front page who had nothing to do with anything. The editor should have been publicly flogged and then hung for that.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 10:52, Reply)
They actually love all the disgusting details. THAT'S why they want to know what he did. They want to sit and enjoy it over a nice cuppa.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:02, Reply)
end up attacking a doctor after the Star (or was it News of the World?) mistakenly labelled a registered paediatrician as a paedophile?
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:11, Reply)
With screams of "she gives sweets to children after touching them"
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:13, Reply)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4719364.stm
But judging by some of the placards you see mis-spelling paedophile, it's not unlikely.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:14, Reply)

(Also one of the few with correct spelling, I notice...)
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:17, Reply)
As though it should be followed by more bunting, reading "for the lads".
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:19, Reply)
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:35, Reply)
Or females?
Becuse if it's females in general, that figures.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:51, Reply)
What he did was fucking awful but people forget he was a kid when he did it. I saw one group with people saying he should be killed. They were 10. I asked some of these fine upstanding people if they could personally kill a 10 year old murderer and they all said yes.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:16, Reply)
these sketches, despite being absolutely fucking hilarious, have a disturbing ring of truth about them.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:26, Reply)
Classic.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 11:56, Reply)
and he has a really quiet voice with a Geordie accent, whenever he rings it makes me think of the meatsafe murderer and I start snickering.
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 12:12, Reply)
(, Mon 8 Mar 2010, 12:24, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread