b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 663448 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

I just bit into a kit kat
AND THERE WAS NO WAFFER????!!!!

How am I meant to feel about this?
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:52, 73 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
Fucking overjoyed!
Waffer is the pits (unless it's pink).
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:53, Reply)
I have heard rumours of the "all chocolate kitkat"
One kid in school claimed he had had one but we didn't believe him. How many fingers and were they all minus the wafer?

*edit* I don't eat Nestles as I was bought up to believe they are evil so I haven't had a kit kat since 1988.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:54, Reply)
I've had one
It was just the one finger of a two-finger.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:54, Reply)
It's always more satisfying
if you get all four fingers.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:12, Reply)
Not for me it isn't

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:13, Reply)
Do you find they fill you up too much?

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:15, Reply)
yes, you dirty bastard

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:17, Reply)
I'm too knackered to be particularly witty today. Crass innuendo will have to suffice.
(So at least today I've got an excuse)
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:18, Reply)
*sniggers*

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:17, Reply)
And how many fingers do you like, young man?
Edit: I think some ironic racism just disappeared from underneath me.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:22, Reply)
you filth-merchant!

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:12, Reply)
And you can sod off an' all!

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:13, Reply)
but I've only just got here?
kind of
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:14, Reply)
Alright you can stay
But behave
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:17, Reply)
4, it was only one of the 4.

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:55, Reply)
Overjoyed
It is very lucky and satisfying to find a Kit-Kat that is a whole unadulterated chunk of lovely Rowntree* chocolate.

*I know, but I can't.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:54, Reply)
Can't what? Say Nestle?

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:54, Reply)
I am loyal to Rowntree.

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:55, Reply)
Well I heard Rowntree is sleeping with you best mate.

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:59, Reply)
Rowan(tree) Atkinson !

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:02, Reply)
Ouch gonz!

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:05, Reply)
r0o0o0o0otah, I just watched some Crufts.
Oh man, in all seriousness, dogs are fucking awesome.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:11, Reply)
My mate's just got a puppy :(

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:13, Reply)
What kind of puppy? PHOTOS !

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:18, Reply)
I ain;t got none
but it's springbatt
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:19, Reply)
I'm here for one post today. This one.
I'd like to use it to say 'What the fuck is a Springbatt?'
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:25, Reply)
excellent use of a post
well done

I echo your sentiment
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:28, Reply)
A springer spaniel/Bassett Hound

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:28, Reply)
oh my god
that must be the best dog in the world
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:32, Reply)
Better than this?
NSFW kinda
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:37, Reply)
yes
much better than that
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:37, Reply)
I grew up with Keeshonds
Lovely dogs, not too mental though they love running in circles. Mine didn't have giant norks though.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:39, Reply)

OH MAN !
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:36, Reply)
Stanley is black and white

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:38, Reply)
I'm glad my best friend is getting some quality Rowntree action

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:05, Reply)
Ecstatic
all chocolate is the stuff of legend
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:55, Reply)
Betrayed? Bewildered?

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:57, Reply)
I just don't know???
See more chocolate= good
but not what I expected= bad

I'm confused.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:58, Reply)
I believe you shall remain this way until you find a KitKat Chunky
and nom it to its waffery chocolaty death.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:02, Reply)
sound advice
as a previous recipient of an all-chocolate kitkat finger I can empathise with Chompy's dilemma, and can definitely see the logic and merit in your solution
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:14, Reply)
Why thank you! :)

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:14, Reply)
the pleasure was all mine

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:27, Reply)
well yes
but then you could end up like me with an all chocolate kit kat chunky! now that was pretty tough going.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:14, Reply)
Oh man!
There are too many KitKat dilemmas!
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:15, Reply)
don't even get me started
on caramel Kit Kat chunkys. if it's not liquid, it's not caramel, I don't care what they say!
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:17, Reply)
umm
the caramel in them is liquid isn't it?

the peanut butter ones are the ones you should be taking against. I didn't realise it was peanut butter when I first had one, just thinking it was peanut, which would've been great, so I was horrified to find they'd put peanut butter in it. not even chunky peanut butter!
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:19, Reply)
not the last time I checked, no!
this disease is spreading too. my girlfriend had a box of milk tray (IIRC) for her birthday and the caramel was solid in there as well. if this is to be caramel's new direction it can go hang.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:22, Reply)
how very dare they?
the swine!
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:28, Reply)
indeed!

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:30, Reply)
ashamed of the spelling of said substance?
unless, of course, you were attempting some "python" humour....
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:58, Reply)
I have no shame.

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:59, Reply)
Good for you
That's what I like to hear
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:02, Reply)
Hail Lord PsychoChomp
Finder of the legendary waferless kitkat. All hail.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:05, Reply)

waferless wafferless, please.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:23, Reply)
More importantly:
How fucking funny is this fellow?

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:21, Reply)
It's the 'tache that really makes it

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:22, Reply)
A big pink tache
Monty in Las Vegas?
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:26, Reply)
If only I had Photoshop skillz
I could change it to say 'David Bowie'. This would make me inordinately happy.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:29, Reply)
here you go


don't abuse it all at once...
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:34, Reply)
You FUCKING BEAUTY.

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:35, Reply)
nay bother :D
i should really go home now.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:36, Reply)
damn
much quicker than me. but then I'm working with paint.net, rather than anything more fancy
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:37, Reply)
handily
i still had photoshop open. BAM!
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:38, Reply)
it was the text orientation that was taking me the time
not done it in paint.net before so I didn't know where to look...
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:39, Reply)
thing is...
whispers... I don't really have a problem with Bowie
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:42, Reply)
I FUCKING DO.

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:42, Reply)
nor me
I quite like some of his stuff

Labyrinth in particular, but he's done some decent songs as well

Shockingly, I heard a good KISS song yesterday, didn't think there was one.

and I realised that I still like Hold me, thrill me, kiss me, kill me by U2. I'm not sure how that makes me feel.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:43, Reply)
Ashamed?

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:47, Reply)
yeah, but that's only the obvious emotion
it makes me angry as well, not to mention furious and wrathful.

but there is more to it than that.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:48, Reply)
I've managed to almost completely avoid KISS
I can only name one tune. They seem like a bunch of spastics.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:50, Reply)
their music is meh
but they have a huge following, and they dress up like dickheads.

and they are really ugly when not wearing makeup.

when I said a good KISS song, I was mainly comparing it to their other stuff. Stupid thing is, I have no idea what the song was now.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:52, Reply)
It's added to my profile
I love it to bits.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:42, Reply)
You could
stick it up your arse, bake it a bit and shit buttons.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 18:54, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1