b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 718196 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Any film that isn't
a) another romantic comedy
b) a sequel/reboot/re-imagining of a perfectly good film.
c) described using the words "darker" or "gritty"
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 14:59, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
I like "dark" and "gritty" films
Batman Begins/Dark Knight benefit greatly from being dark and gritty, rather than "twee" and "nipply-batsuit".
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:01, Reply)
Yes, but it's gotten to the point where fucking everything is described with those two adjectives.
Films like that are excellent, I just wish Hollywood would read a bloody thesaurus and get some new words.
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:03, Reply)
Obscured and gravell-y?

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:04, Reply)
I'll take anything.
Anything at all.
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:09, Reply)
FILTH

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:09, Reply)
Hell, I'll even take them knock-kneed and bald.
Edit -
Buggar -I mis-quoted.

Man, I'm gonna tell you my story
-Go on and tell about it, go on and tell about it more
-Just what I've been doing
-What you've been doing, Ry ?
-Well, you know I used to be particular about the womens that I picked
-Aha!
-Yeah! They used to be tender, lean and tall, that's all
-But the way things has been going, I'll take 'em knock-kneed and bow-legged
-What ?
-I'll even take 'em bald! Man. I'll tell you why
-Please, tell me why!
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:12, Reply)
I'm not that easy, dear.
I do have some standards
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:19, Reply)
I somewhat doubt that

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:20, Reply)
:(

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:22, Reply)
This is true.
If you're going to do a non-serious Batman flick then at least do it in the style of the TV show. Otherwise it's just shit.
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:03, Reply)
Much as I liked Begins/Dark Knight
Part of me thinks they should just abandon Christian Bale and re-cast Adam West, replete with the all the old sound effect screens depicting "POW!", "BAM!" "SHAZAM!", "SODOMISE!", etc.
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:21, Reply)
Only if there's judicious use of shark repellant

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:24, Reply)
repellent.

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:28, Reply)
Thank you.

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:29, Reply)
Yes you are, but what am I?

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:31, Reply)
A shark

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:34, Reply)
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark
Which is not, as some people might have you believe, a film about a ham omelet.

I'd like to see Hamlet given the Baz Luhrman treatment that was used on Romeo and Juliet.

And not because I'm Danish. Oh no.
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:06, Reply)
Ken's film was good, if a little long.

(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:13, Reply)
I wouldn't like to see anything
given the Baz Luhrman treatment
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:21, Reply)
I'd like to see Baz Luhrman given
the 'savage beating' treatment.
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:29, Reply)
Hmm. As I see it, the biggest problem with Baz Luhrman's version of Romeo and Juliet
was that it was absolutely fucking shit.
(, Mon 10 May 2010, 15:34, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1