Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Daniel Radcliffe is as well
I think it is something to do with the Harry Potter films. It makes even good actors look shit (Alan Rickman) and non-actors look terrible (most of the kids). The only people who manage to avoid the curse are Michael Gambon and Gary Oldman, and that just serves to highlight how awful everyone else is.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:49, Reply)
They aren't brilliant, but they aren't dreadful either.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:50, Reply)
There's no one else who could play it better
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:51, Reply)
but I find his performance kind of weird. I think Tim Roth could have played a slimier, nastier version, which is what was called for.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:57, Reply)
I've seen a couple of recentish Jeremy Irons things and he was awful.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:02, Reply)
That role was made for him
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:02, Reply)
I just can't see him ever uttering a line better than "And what are we going to do with you, you little scamp?" to someone 8 years older than him
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:08, Reply)
largely because I thought that David Jason was a shit choice for Rincewind.
I can't imagine Jeremy Irons as the Patrician either. Charles Dance, who played him in Going Postal was excellent
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:18, Reply)
In possibly the best casting idea of all time
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:35, Reply)
I do think it's a good way for kids to be exposed to some brilliant actors like Rickman, Gambon, Coltrane, Oldman etc as they might go and check out some of there other work. Plus Hermione has turned into a walking prison sentence.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:52, Reply)
I can't help but compare them to the kids in the Narnia films who are much more natural. I think that's the problem, the ones in Harry Potter seem much more like they are acting.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:53, Reply)
which is a shame because the acting is so much more important.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:00, Reply)
had to dye their blonde hair ginger. I would be so worried it wouldn't go back.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:02, Reply)
and I thought Malfoy got increasingly better as he got older.
Plus, fit.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:53, Reply)
I forgot Robbie Coltrane, and Helena Bonham Carter is always good (we don't talk about Planet of the Apes)
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:54, Reply)
I watched the new Alice in Wonderland last night. Cause of the bad reviews I wanted to wait until the hype had died done and I loved it. I was expecting to hate it but found myself loving it. Could have been due to the spain germany excitement as well though.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:56, Reply)
I reckon it'd have been better if I hadn't seen it in 3D.
I love the books and enjoy other people's take on the characters and the land.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:57, Reply)
twas Alice and is the only book ive downloaded onto my phone. Its pretty cool having an ireader on your mobile. I didnt watch it in 3d, have yet to experience that medium, am dreading dissapointment.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:00, Reply)
Avatar was cool in 3D as a novelty, but even in that the 3D didn't make it like looking across a room, it looked like a bunch of seperate layers at different distances.
Not worth the extra money or the extra blurriness on the things at the edge of focus in my opinion.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:01, Reply)
but I just thought it was really boring and I didn't care about any of the characters, so the end battle scene was redundant because I didn't care who won.
I did make a replica of Alice's red dress though because it was so pretty.
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 9:59, Reply)
aniebyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/New-Alice-in-Wonderland-Mia-Wasikowska-Photoshoot-alice-in-wonderland-2010-10340861-1183-1450.jpg
(, Thu 8 Jul 2010, 10:05, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread