
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular

I have a question, though. Someone asked me if it's true that all Brits hate Americans, although I found the opposite when I took my trip.
Of course I know the stereotypes (baseball hats, elastic pants, velor suits), but is it true? Do you hate us?
Alt Q (as it appears to be obligatory): Would you go for a non-themed wedding around halloween or wait until the summertime?
Edit: I'm sorry for posting so soon after Kitty's thread. Please forgive me, Kitty!
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:03, 34 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

all the info I need to take you all down!!!!
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:45, Reply)

I didn't mean to. Will I get yelled at now, internet style?
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:06, Reply)

But I get on with nearly all I've met.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:11, Reply)

Seriously? I'm curious as my first time out of the States was last week.
I admit, I live in Hicksville, but I swear I'm not a redneck!
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:15, Reply)

it's just you as a country or in big groups.
Plus you're all fat.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:18, Reply)

when you get two or more americans together there is the potential for them to start whooping and cheering.
We don't like that sort of behaviour.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:20, Reply)

Usually when I go downtown with my friends, we get drunk and discuss politics or religion.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:24, Reply)

Don't let me down.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:14, Reply)

could potentially be near halloween.
what's wrong with having it then?
Chompy summed up views on Americans nicely, and like him I get on with nearly all I've met.
The problem is that, from the outside at least, it seems like Americans think they are better than everyone else and deserving of special treatment purely because of that. Merely being an American is not some kind of achievement.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:18, Reply)

I don't think we're better than anybody else, but I've not been out of Farmville for long (yes, I just said Farmville) and am still figuring out the big bad world.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:22, Reply)

that it's easy to think that most americans are like those on tv.
but given that there are like 250 million of you(?) that's almost certainly not the case.
I've not met an american I didn't get on with.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:28, Reply)

but it does give a sense of "we're the only ones qualified to deal with the world's crises"
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:30, Reply)

perhaps old and fat ninja editing. Where you can see his grey underpants peeking out of his ninja uniform where it doesn't quite fit around his middle anymore. And he's wearing slippers.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:38, Reply)

or I'll never teach you how to make a ninja mask out of a t shirt
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:52, Reply)

But all together, ghastly. Something to do with kicking us out on our arses in the eighteenth century.
We have long memories.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:36, Reply)

They threw our tea into the Atlantic; 240 years later, we did the same with their oil.
Revenge is sweet. Specifically, revenge is sweet light crude.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:41, Reply)

But I'm assuming it won't be so epic.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:38, Reply)

At least, if you mean individual Brits and individual Americans. That'd be daft.
And a lot of Brits on the right wing idolise America and everything it does.
For the rest of us, it's a complicated affair. We don't understand a great deal of American culture, and there're large chunks of it that we'd rather not have - the creationism, the patriotism, the religiosity, the anti-socialism (even Callmedave Cameron would be lambasted as a socialist by US standards, remember), the commercialism, the preppiness, the general conservatism, the can-do attitude... we think they're all deeply strange and/ or worthy of suspicion.
And all this has to be understood in the context of British and American history. Britain is a very minor power that was once (and for a very short time) a very major power. We're just about beginning to get our heads around that, and the concomitant ideas that we aren't militarily or economically all that important, we shouldn't have a seat on the UN security council, the future is in the EU, and so on. It's a slow process, and most of us don't want to admit it to ourselves because, frankly, it's a bit embarrassing to most people.
We see America as partly an emblem of what we once were, and what we would still quite like to be. So there's some jealousy there. But it's tempered by the fact that America, too, is a declining power. So there's a slightly sardonic satisfaction that British decline is beginning to be reflected in the US, combined with a sense of superiority bankrolled by the fact that we (just about) accept our decline, and Americans (as yet) seem not to. So there's a kind of patronising attitude, too: we think of ourselves as (slightly) older, sadder and wiser than you lot.
In short: we don't hate you. We just think we're better.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:40, Reply)

but I'd add not that the Americans aren't accepting their decline as a power, but that they don't see it.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:46, Reply)

but we're only just beginning to see it, and we've been in decline since at least 1945 (and probably 1918: the writing was on the wall from shortly after WW1). Trident anyone? And imagine any UK politician saying that the size of the armed forces should be reduced by at least half, and the permanent place on the UNSC surrendered...
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:49, Reply)

but as a nation we just felt smugly superior, rather than outwardly whooping about being the best :-)
Really, it's the whooping that I don't like.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:51, Reply)

When Dubya visited the site of the erstwhile World Trade Center, there was a scene where the builders there started chanting USA! USA! USA!. And that made me think, "See, THIS has a lot to do with it..."
(Which reminds me: on 11.ix.01, my brother was in a youth hostel in Salzburg with his mates. There was also an American there. They were - obviously - watching the news. The American asked to the room, "Why do they hate us?" My brother and his mates explained in great depth exactly why. For two hours. Sometimes my brother is great.)
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:55, Reply)

why on earth would anyone suggest we give up our seat on the UNSC? Even if though we're a small country of less significance than we think we are, why would you reduce that further by giving up a permanent seat?
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:58, Reply)

so the UK giving up its seat is part of that. And I don't see a problem with unilateralism on that front - if all members ought to give up their permanent seats, then the fact that some don't doesn't reduce the obligation.
But, if there's going to be a permanent membership (or at least a membership that doesn't rotate as quickly as it does for the current non P5 states), then there seems to be an argument available along the lines that it should have something to do with population, economic might, military might, strategic importance and ability to maintain the peace. The UK scores badly on all those: were the UN to be set up now, there's no way that the UK would be a candidate seat holder. So the argument for retaining the seat seems to rest on the fact that, once upon a time, it was more justified than now. Yet the idea that you can run a major international body on the strength of what member states once were seems deeply strange.
EDIT: That is to say, it's not about reducing significance, so much as recognising it.
EDIT 2: The other advantage of giving up the P5 seat is that it'd piss off most Brits royally, and that'd be intensely satisfying.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 10:07, Reply)

(compared to countries that don't have nay for example, not compared to the US or Russia) so, whether you agree with it, that still makes us fairly significant.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 10:12, Reply)

including those that're undeclared. If it's nukes that count, then permanent seats should also go to South Africa, Israel, India, Pakistan, North Korea, possibly Iran, possibly Syria and so on.
In terms of non-nuclear importance, they should also go to Brazil, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and a few others.
British decline isn't absolute, of course; it's relative. But that's what really counts. So you either have to accept that the P5 criteria are arbitrary - in which case, the moral authority seems to vanish - or that there should be a mechanism to remove states - in which case, bye-bye UK - or that more and more states can have permanent seats - in which case, the very idea of a two-tier SC looks to be untenable, and we're in effect back to the League of Nations and its requirement for unanimity in decisionmaking.
None of the horns of this trilemma looks too attractive to those who want the UK to keep its P5 seat...
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 10:22, Reply)

only messing pal. You lot are ok but whenever I go to the states it really is a minority of people who come across as semi intelligent and decent.
You seem alright though so well done. Here is a gold star.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 9:44, Reply)

My father lives amongst you and is married to one. Some of my best friends are New Yorkers and as a nation your contribution to world culture, though terrible in some respects, is mindblowing in others (like music).
I find your enthusiasm and missing embarrassment gene appalling and alluring in equal measures. I love your openness partly because I am so completely different from this. I also really like American women A LOT.
The one thing I really cannot stand is the constant graduating from everything. Stop it. You graduate from University: THAT'S IT. Not from fucking primary school etc. I realise it's great for short-term confidence but it's just fucking silly.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 10:00, Reply)

that sums it up very nicely.
My embarrassment gene is very finely tuned.
( , Wed 11 Aug 2010, 10:02, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »