Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
why don't you read the post first. I don't have a problem with cyclists but they don't need to ride side by side chatting holding up the fucking traffic.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 13:50, 1 reply, 16 years ago)
If there is room to overtake one cyclist there should be room to overtake two cyclists moving side by side you should allow as much room for a cyclist as a car.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 13:52, Reply)
I'll make a couple of my own then. You don't live in the countryside and you're a cyclist.
Sometimes Al you're wrong. All the time you're a cunt.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 13:54, Reply)
I think that's a pretty cunty attitude.
The highway code says it's okay to ride up to two abreast if you want.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 13:56, Reply)
cause all government reccomendations are advisable and correct in all situations. I was being flippant Al, I forgot that all your posts are verbatim and factually accurate. God forbid you were to make a joke about something that might upset somebody but when it's something you like, cycling, you turn into some prick enforcer. Just chill the fuck out man.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 13:58, Reply)
you insist on being an arrogant cunt on the internet.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:04, Reply)
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:08, Reply)
it fits on my profile after the comment you made one of the first times you got upset.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:20, Reply)
I thought you would at least try and make some sort of argument back. Instead you just avoided the points I made and reverted back to the 'look I made someone react' mode. Bert does that.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:24, Reply)
I also like the "monumental cunt" one. If I didn't post a picture of that vagina shaped sculpture in new york then I should've done
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:36, Reply)
I always used to get so annoyed when I lived in the countryside and cyclists would ride two abreast because it was impossible to overtake them, so they often made me late for work.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:11, Reply)
but there's nothing illegal in what they're doing. Personally if I noticed a large queue I would drop back behind.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:18, Reply)
then post a picture of you with a shoe on your head crying red hot tears of frustrated rage.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:24, Reply)
but it pisses me off anyway.
It's just bad fucking manners if nothing else. I mostly see it on single lane (each way) A roads on the way to the north coast, where there are very few places to safely overtake a car or two bikes side by side, and yet the speed limit is safely 60 mph.
Being stuck behind two cunts on bikes travelling at 20mph is most frustrating in those situations and I would like the cyclists to give that some thought and stop doing it for the few seconds that it takes for cars to pass.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:19, Reply)
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:22, Reply)
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:23, Reply)
especially people who drive on roads when I want to drive somewhere
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:25, Reply)
but loads of them round here are 60 mph speed limits yet everyday there is some tosser driving at 30. And people don't indicate in the countryside that is fecking annoying.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:26, Reply)
grockles are tourists, mainly used for those not from the south west when they are here clogging up our roads.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:51, Reply)
You should leave a car's width in case they have to swerve or move for anything anyway. If I'm on my bike, there are few things as annoying as cars overtaking right next to you.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:00, Reply)
I'm just being a cunt, pure and simple.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:01, Reply)
I'm clearly just picking up latent grumpiness, we couldn't possibly both be right.
(, Wed 18 Aug 2010, 14:04, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread