Alt: I say no, not entirely.
There are what appear to me to be without doubt purely selfless acts committed every day that cannot merely be explained away by the 'selfish gene'.

I think Dawkins is a bit of a cock, despite my agreeing with most of what he has to say.
( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 8:40, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

You can be right and still a dickhead.

( girlinthehole, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 8:42, Reply)

Thanks!

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 8:47, Reply)

Monty, you have started answering your own questions.
Are you turning into Gonz?
( Bartleby A dead man on vacation, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 9:07, Reply)

I dnon't think sewe. Hopefullie knotte.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 9:44, Reply)

This reads like a 17th century manuscript!

( sporters I’m sincerely gratitude to you, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 9:56, Reply)

It doesn't mean 'selfishness gene'. That mistake crops up a lot.
It means, roughly, 'genes are dedicated to protecting their own existence/continuance'.
(Falstaff's Spiritual Successor, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 9:48, Reply)