Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
We regard altruism as an individual, personal act, and an active decision, and Dawkins is talking about a subconsious predisposition that is driven by our genetic and memetic make up.
I had a long-running argument on here (well, /talk) with someone who just didn't "get" evolution, or rather thought they did, but were wrong. They wouldn't accept that "survival of the fittest" does not mean "strongest" or "healthiest" but more "best suited for purpose" ... so there potentially is an evolutionary advantage in helping the weak and sick long-term, for instance, if it conveys an advantage upon the human race or ecosystem as a whole.
(massive debate shortened for space)
Of course it doesn't help that "survival of the fittest" is a misquote anyway.
(, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 9:52, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
...but not enough to organise, desire more and rebel.
That is where cultures/empires fail.
(, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 9:58, Reply)
but then the ants realise they're actually stronger then the grasshoppers and stand up to them and it's just ACE.
(, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 10:00, Reply)
I hate his voice, theatrical pretensions and male pattern baldness - the big gaybo.
(, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 10:07, Reply)
(, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 10:12, Reply)
Shameless they are.
(, Wed 22 Sep 2010, 10:48, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread