Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
i had to scratch off the time of arrival, which was 12:10pm. i scratched off both the 12 and the 10 in the hours column. as these fucking things are like gold-dust, i then scratched off the 10 in the minutes column rather than using a fresh one, and left. (i) it was obvious to an illiterate monkey (ie a traffic warden) what i meant; and (ii) the earliest i could therefore have parked was 10:10am. either which way, it was clear.
when i got there at 8.30am the next morning... parking ticket. the scrubby, pikey, cheating, unscrupulous, desperate, working on commission, get a real job bastards.
i'm damned if i'm paying it, i'll see them in court!
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:05, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
you've just admitted it's your fault you got it wrong and therefore according to the terms and conditions which you are implicitly accepting by using the ticket, you have invalidated the ticket.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:14, Reply)
but i don't consider it to be invalid. on the face of the ticket, it was quite clear. if i had arrived after 10.10am, i could have seen their point - conceivably i could have had more than 24 hours.
if i weren't a lawyer, i'd just scratch off a new ticket and send them that with a letter saying "what's your problem?"
but my practising certificate is worth more than a £35 parking ticket, sadly.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:26, Reply)
which I'm almost certain will, according to the T&Cs, render the ticket invalid.
So really you ought to look at it as an expensive lesson in colouring between the lines.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:31, Reply)
also there is nothing in the Ts & Cs about scratching off 2 boxes invalidating a ticket. NOTHING. don't get me started on the legal ramifications of interpreting express and implied contractual clauses. but i will be really irritating the cunts at oxford city council parking department. it's the principle of the thing - that man/woman could clearly SEE i was not breaching anything. AND i was the only car on the street, so it's not as if i was even taking up spaces for residents. argh!
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:36, Reply)
You should still try not to be such a clumsy arse in future though
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:38, Reply)
would be more accurate.
yes, i intend to exploit their weakness. ha.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:41, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread