Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
I wonder if any of you would be able to help me with something. As you may be aware, I make corsets! Each one is made to the customer's exact measurements, so I have to draw an individual pattern out for each one. This is obviously quite time consuming, so what I wanted to know is if it's possible, through whatever software, to have a standard pattern on my computer and to then elongate or reduce certain sections of each pattern piece according to the customer's measurements. I would then want to print out the pattern and for it to be actual size.
Any ideas?
Alt Q: If you could have one tool grafted onto your hand, what would it be? I think I would have my first two fingers turned into scissors, although not all my fingers, you saw how that worked out for Edward.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:40, 58 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
What's that? There's a small stone stuck in your horse's hoof, miss? I can help!
And you could set up a pretty simple Excel document where you put in a set of measurements and it works out your dimensions without too much trouble.
Actually drawing it, however, would take a fair bit more work.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:43, Reply)
the excel thing. The way it works is I have 6 pattern pieces for each side of the corset and most of them are roughly hourglass shape so I have to increase or decrease the top, middle and bottom according to the measurements and each one has to be altered by the same amount or it ends up wonky. It would be great to have a programme to figure out how much I shoud increase or decrease stuff by. If anyone's offering...!
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:44, Reply)
An excel part that works out dimensions, and then some sort of 2D CAD layout that you can vary the dimensions of once excel's worked them out?
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:48, Reply)
I do have autocad for students but I can't work it yet, I haven't even looked at it. Is it easy to do that sort of thing in CAD?
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:51, Reply)
If you have the main outlines, you should be able to put a number of lines across in certain places according to the measurements, and when you changed those it would pull the main outlines to the correct size and shape.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:56, Reply)
I'll learn me up some CAD then. What about the life-size printing bit? Would I have to make it bigger on screen for it to print out in actual size, or is there a way of printing it as it looks?
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:00, Reply)
If not then it's fairly pointless.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:04, Reply)
Wiggy mentioned a life size printer too. Can I not make the pattern piece bigger on screen and then just work out the scale from screen to page?
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:06, Reply)
but it'll invole taping lots of A4 sheets together.
I think the spreadsheet that works out all the dimensions for you would help but it won't do it all for you.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:08, Reply)
the width of most pieces is around 4" and the biggest piece lengthwise is the front centre which is 15" so it would only be maybe two pieces where I would need to tape A4 together, so I could to those two bit in two halves couldn't I?
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:13, Reply)
I don't know anyone with an A3 printer.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:19, Reply)
You would probably need a printers with a barrel printer to get them to print as you needed,
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:07, Reply)
He loves his spreadsheets. I can see a simple equation thing (ie, if I input value X, then Y and Z update according to the defined ratio) being a doddle to do.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:48, Reply)
he's probably sick of me by now
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:55, Reply)
And I'd have a massive frying pan for spanging and bacon cooking
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:43, Reply)
I was thinking if the free vector programme I used to use would work for it
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:48, Reply)
I think that might work as a free option.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:49, Reply)
As I just tried doing it in it. It doesn't let you easily adjust dimensions after they've been initially drawn, and doesn't let you export 2D drawings in the free version.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:52, Reply)
I only used it once to plan my living room, and it mostly worked fine.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:52, Reply)
But the free version's limited in many ways.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:55, Reply)
I like how easily it lets you change the position of certain points on a vector, and adjusts the shape of curves to match it. You can easily add and subtract points from the path, and mess about with them and smooth things. It appears to have lots of preset shapes too, but I don't really care about those. Let's you save as lots of different file types too.
All in all, fair powerful, and free, so definitely worth using.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:11, Reply)
the smoothing thing is important as all the pieces need to flow in a curve when sewn together so It would be good if it adjusted the curve as you moved the width.
Thanks a lot for this, it's really helpful and if it works it could cut an hour out of my 6 hour creation time.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:15, Reply)
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:19, Reply)
but I do have a student version of Autocad, so I might have a play with that, thanks.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:56, Reply)
lotsocash = she means it's very expensive.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:57, Reply)
They are pretty good tools as they are.
Sorry for the boring answer.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:49, Reply)
And then I would never lose them again.
No idea about the other thing.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:49, Reply)
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:52, Reply)
Oh! Or, I'd have the Terminator 2 liquid metal stuff, and then I could do anything with it.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:58, Reply)
for changeable attachments.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:10, Reply)
I did upside down teddy bear thing into superman last night, it was proper smooth and everything. I dismounted by doing a full body splat to the floor though, needs work.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:57, Reply)
I'm working on handstand spin at the moment. It's fucking well hard and damned if I can get it.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:06, Reply)
I HATE IT. Seriously, that's the only move I've been completely unable to do, in terms of I just can't take my hand off the floor. I don't know what it is, I don't know why it scares me but I just cannot make that second hand lift up. I half managed it once, but as soon as I took my hand off the floor my body panicked and my legs immediately clung to the pole in a tangled mess which took me ages to get down from!
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:08, Reply)
I just seem to take my head the wrong way round, and end up clinging upside down to the pole, only having moved about two inches round.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:20, Reply)
I struggle with putting my left leg out at 90 degrees away from the pole, I always feel like I'm just going to fall off horribly so as soon as I start to try and spin I just automatically cling to the pole like wet tissue.
We'll have to practice it next week, with mats of course!
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:45, Reply)
So I could transfer data at a touch, but also fire lightning like The Emperor.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:52, Reply)
didn't they try and develop microchip phones a while ago in Japan where you have an implant in your hand? Or was that a joke?
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 10:58, Reply)
and your mums face
and all other female relatives
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:01, Reply)
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:06, Reply)
I spend ages sitting there with a calculator trying to figure out the measurements plus seam allowances. Any chance you'd be able to help me? I'd really appreciate it.
(, Thu 7 Oct 2010, 11:09, Reply)
Illustrator and work full scale, printing and taping A4 sheets together introduces a certain amount of error, so you do need to then measure your pattern pieces and adjust manually, but it works just about fine.
CAD is great, but although I have managed to do patterns with regular autocad, I found it significantly quicker and easier to use illustrator, modifying a basic block pattern.
If you need templates I can upload some basic stuff for you to get an idea.
(, Fri 8 Oct 2010, 1:06, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »