Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
just have "RE:" as the subject line. Beat that for thrilling.
the sixth says "FW: Centre for Sport and Exercise - Autumn Newsletter"
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:14, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
4050. And that's only the uncategorised stuff, I've got another 15,000 sorted. And my mailbox autoarchives anything over 6 months old into a whole other system. *weeps*
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:18, Reply)
but I think that it's more a demonstration of how much needless email is sent, really.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:24, Reply)
and posting here.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:24, Reply)
I have one that is:
'FW: Ang. RE: Ang. RE: PO 3593 and Item Ref. 602388'
Whilst it may read as 'Angry', Angry' etc - it is actually a long-running exchange with a Swedish shelving manufacturer.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:20, Reply)
FW: [Classics UG] Joint Consultative Committee for Undergraduates
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:25, Reply)
this should make you laugh though SFW: fuckyeahterribleart.tumblr.com/post/1177194201/so-beautiful
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:28, Reply)
that compared to everyone else on the internet, we're comparatively normal. I mean just take a look at the freaks on mumsnet
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:32, Reply)
but I've seen them covered in newspapers. And I stand by my point. We're relatively normal
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:41, Reply)
well, probably EPS rather than classics, but that just makes it worse.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:27, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread