b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 961863 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

5 of the first 6 emails in my inbox
just have "RE:" as the subject line. Beat that for thrilling.

the sixth says "FW: Centre for Sport and Exercise - Autumn Newsletter"
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:14, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

first
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:16, Reply)
Oh, man, you have NO idea how much I wish that was true.

4050. And that's only the uncategorised stuff, I've got another 15,000 sorted. And my mailbox autoarchives anything over 6 months old into a whole other system. *weeps*
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:18, Reply)
You must have a HUGE penis

(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:21, Reply)

have be
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:22, Reply)
Well yeah, obviously
but I think that it's more a demonstration of how much needless email is sent, really.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:24, Reply)
You need to do some housekeeping

(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:23, Reply)
I would if I had the time inbetween reading all the fucking email.


and posting here.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:24, Reply)
Easy.
I have one that is:

'FW: Ang. RE: Ang. RE: PO 3593 and Item Ref. 602388'

Whilst it may read as 'Angry', Angry' etc - it is actually a long-running exchange with a Swedish shelving manufacturer.

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:20, Reply)
not as bad as
FW: [Classics UG] Joint Consultative Committee for Undergraduates
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:25, Reply)
I think we could be at stalemate here.

(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:27, Reply)
I believe so
this should make you laugh though SFW: fuckyeahterribleart.tumblr.com/post/1177194201/so-beautiful
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:28, Reply)
It has indeed.
How fucking insane is that?
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:30, Reply)
It's odd to realise
that compared to everyone else on the internet, we're comparatively normal. I mean just take a look at the freaks on mumsnet
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:32, Reply)
I never have. They're rabid Daily Mailers, right?

(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:33, Reply)
I have no idea
but I've seen them covered in newspapers. And I stand by my point. We're relatively normal
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:41, Reply)
that site has some mad shit

(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:46, Reply)
Innit.

(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:53, Reply)
I've got some of those as well I think.
well, probably EPS rather than classics, but that just makes it worse.
(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:27, Reply)
I don't even do Classics :(

(, Tue 9 Nov 2010, 17:28, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1