
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

As you said, the belief (at least where karma in Hinduism is concerned) is that transgressors will 'get theirs' after they've died. For it to be demonstrably bollocks, wouldn't you have to demonstrate that reincarnation (either as another human being or as any other lifeform/object) does not and can not exist?
To make it clear, I'm not arguing if it's bollocks or not, I'm questioning your use of 'demonstrably'.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 10:37, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

But it's past the itching stage and into the secondary 'onion skin' stage :)
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 10:41, Reply)

Give me a single shred of solid evidence that it's not a fatuous stream of camel-dung made up by charlatans for the benefit of imbeciles.
GO ON, DO IT NOW.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 10:47, Reply)

Lack of evidence isn't proof of the counterpoint. It's a good indicator that it doesn't happen, but it's not solid proof.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 10:50, Reply)

in that technically absence of proof is not proof of absence but at some point common sense must prevail.
I cannot prove emphatically that tomorrow I am not going to turn into a 15-foot bright blue gibbon....but let's face it, I'm not, am I?
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 10:56, Reply)

Hence I'm only questioning the use of 'demonstrably', not the bollocks quotient of karma.
Personally I don't fully put stock in any 'after-life' scenario (heaven, reincarnation, oblivion etc.), but am not intrigued/worried enough to take Pascal's Wager on my deathbed.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:01, Reply)

saying that something is "arguably bollocks" won't generate as much debate.
Aren't people odd.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:03, Reply)

"The notion that Labs is a handsome young gent is arguably bollocks"
"The notion that Monty is a short, fat, black lesbian hippy is demonstrably bollocks"
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:12, Reply)

means that next time I see you I will repeatedly kick you in the (arguable or demonstrable, take your pick...) bollocks.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:56, Reply)

Alternatively, if this were a Disney film, your daughter would now suggest playing a game which involved you pretending to be a 15ft blue gibbon, and you would be larking about like crazy and then suddenly catch sight of yourself in a mirror and have a "maybe I should try seeing the world differently" moment.
Fortunately this isn't a Disney film.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:06, Reply)

this is like a more saccharine and slightly less demented 'Gonz fantasy sequence' post.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:10, Reply)

( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:15, Reply)

Regarding common sense; you're right, absence of proof does not prove its absence, but there comes a point at which the pragmatist in you must recognise that the complete, overwhelming absence of proof is pretty damning and that if you believe in that then you might as well believe in your latent ability to transform into a 15-ft blue gibbon.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:11, Reply)

I'm a bit busy, otherwise I'd 'shop Monty as a massive blue gibbon ;)
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:16, Reply)

I do hope you have free time and inclination later on.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:17, Reply)

But in philosophical discussions you have to be very precise with language, just as you do in any kind of debate. It's one way my philosophy degree helps me in my job.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:20, Reply)

...of pharaohs, royalty and the famous is rather overwhelming.
And they are all very sane members of society....
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 10:51, Reply)

in genealogical terms you're probably not far off. It doesn't take very long in going back generations to reach a point where there are more people necessary to provide your genes today than were actually alive at the time.
You're probably partly Cleopatra, as am I.
However, past lives are only believed in by the type of open-mouthed idiots that also believe in the metaphysical healing powers of rocks.
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 10:57, Reply)

( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:00, Reply)

...of one of Cleopatra's hand-maidens.
Oddly enough the following facts are true:
- She is twice divorced and is a total fag-hag.
- She has lots of cats.
- She raised three dysfunctional kids; the oldest ODd in 2002, her daughter is an aging 'exotic dancer' and the most functioning one is a suicidal nut job
- Was an 'expert' in power-crystals, kabbalah and astrology until they went 'out of fashion.
- Is now an 'expert' in gemetria and reiki.
Just like any religious zealout she has a tenuous grasp on reality and has devoted her life to mumbo jumbo and genuinely believes she has been helped by such faddish flights of fancy.
Sad innit?
( , Fri 19 Nov 2010, 11:03, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread