b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 983823 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

*snivels*
I grumble about earning 1k a month AFTER tax.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:20, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
It's annoying to know I could earn 15-20k more just by moving to London
Albeit I'd also have to sacrifice a lot more free time, pay more in rent, and likely have to cut my hair and shed piercings :/
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:22, Reply)
You're not moving here.

(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:23, Reply)
Too right I'm not
My balls are safer here.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:25, Reply)
Yes. SafER.

(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:27, Reply)
I'm just going to leave them at home whenever I attend bashes in the future

(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:27, Reply)
What will Vee grab?

(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:29, Reply)
One reason I'm leaving them at home

(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:31, Reply)
And remember you'd get arse-raped for a tenner for a frigging salad every sodding lunchtime.

(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:24, Reply)
Aye
Stratford's not far off London prices though, so that wouldn't be a huge step up for me.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:25, Reply)
this is very true
*sad faces*
bought all my family's presents and sent them off and my wallet is in paaaaaaaaaaaain.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 16:12, Reply)
Maybe one day you'll be ready to do that.
If you're happy enough now then why worry.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:24, Reply)
Precisement, Madamoiselle

(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:26, Reply)
I'd likely earn another 5k if I moved to London
that includes the weighting. Science sucks balls, it really does.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:24, Reply)
It's the good thing about my industry being rather small

(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:27, Reply)
*huffs*
Oh well, I doubt I'd want -or be able- to do your job anyway.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:28, Reply)
Oh strikethrough, strikethrough...
*resists*
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:30, Reply)
Micropenislolz

(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:32, Reply)
I'm quite impressed it's even 5K
My salary goes up by £2300 in London. Fucking matched salary scales. Mind you, I can't complain, I'm not at all badly paid except when I remember the salary I left in industry :( :(
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:29, Reply)
It's around that
a lot of the jobs at Imperial/UCL are fairly well paid even before the weighting. Around £20k is average for a technician now, but I'm a ways off that sadly.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:33, Reply)
ah, right
I thought all the academic scales were matched? I got the same salary when I moved from UCL to here because they couldn't pay a lecturer any more and they wouldn't give me SL straightaway. Bah.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:38, Reply)
I think support staff are different to academic
Certain areas it's 17-21, but in places like Cambridge and London it's 20-24. Either way, it's always between 17-24.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:42, Reply)
ah, right so.
I'll hardly say "lucky you" given how shite support salaries in academia are.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:43, Reply)
Put it this way
If I'd gone in to the graduate scheme at McDonalds, by now I'd probably be earning twice as much. Sad, isn't it?
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 15:46, Reply)
yeah. It really is.
Did you see the fucking GQ "rock stars of science" thing? how can a society be so fucked up? Why do we want our scientists to be compared favorably to rock stars? for fucks sake, in any civilised society it should be the other way round.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 16:06, Reply)
Remember of course that GQ has a target audience of
"Hurr, tits!"-grade australopithecines.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 16:16, Reply)
It's a US TV campaign I think :(
not just the magazine.
(, Wed 24 Nov 2010, 16:26, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1