b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 985428 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I'm trying to read Narrow Dog to Carcassone,
it's about a retired couple on a narrowboat who decide to try and cross the channel. I really want to read it but the way the guy writes is just absolutely dreadful. He doesn't use speech marks so it's all he said this and then I said this, blah blah says I to him. It's like wading through tar.
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:15, 3 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
The Irvine Welsh one
was written in full on Glesgea and far too hard to read easily. Also the story was mittens
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:17, Reply)
fuck, if you think that was bad
try "how late it was, how late" by james kelman. I've never got more than 10 pages into that, it's just unintelligible. And I live in Scotland.
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:22, Reply)
That book is fucking brilliant.
Just get used to his writing style. It's fine, it's not that hard to deal with. At least he's not Dan Brown.
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:18, Reply)
Or James Patterson

(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:29, Reply)
I've kind of got into it now
When I first started it I wasn't really concentrating so I kept having to re-read bits and then I got annoyed, but now I'm quite enjoying it. I've been given the sequel, Narrow Dog to Indian River, as well.

I do think the guy thinks he's a bit funnier than he is though and so far when he's tried to be stoic and moving it hasn't really come across very well, but I'm going to keep going with it!
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:36, Reply)

the way the guy writes is just absolutely dreadful. He doesn't use speech marks so it's all he said this and then I said this, blah blah says I to him. It's like wading through tar.
I'm barely literate.
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:31, Reply)
hardly
Man who wrote Angela's Ashes did the same thing- little to no punctuation, and that was a shit book
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:35, Reply)
yeah I just find sometimes I have to read a sentence a couple of times to work out who said what to whom

(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:37, Reply)
I done read good
shut your trap
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:36, Reply)
Irony
(from the Ancient Greek εἰρωνεία eirōneía, meaning dissimulation or feigned ignorance)[1] is a rhetorical device, literary technique, or situation in which there is a sharp incongruity or discordance that goes beyond the simple and evident intention of words or actions.
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:37, Reply)

I've stopped amusing myself now.
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:40, Reply)
yeah, cos THAT's not annoying.

(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:43, Reply)
I'll edit.

(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:44, Reply)
what did i miss?
this makes no sense now
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:54, Reply)
Worth.

(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:44, Reply)
nah, it's a descriptive property of an iron.

(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:40, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1