Petty Officials
Bob de Bilde says: A traffic warden threatened to call the police and have me arrested because "It's illegal to take photos in the street. You might be a paedophile". I was taking a picture of a funny street sign, over which I had no plans to masturbate. Tell us about petty officials talking bollocks.
( , Thu 27 Mar 2014, 15:05)
Bob de Bilde says: A traffic warden threatened to call the police and have me arrested because "It's illegal to take photos in the street. You might be a paedophile". I was taking a picture of a funny street sign, over which I had no plans to masturbate. Tell us about petty officials talking bollocks.
( , Thu 27 Mar 2014, 15:05)
« Go Back
Hazardous Waste (of time)
I rented out an old Victorian terrace house. It was full of nice old features - picture rails, high ceilings, plaster mouldings etc., and a beautiful deep original staircase to the upstairs rooms.
The tenants after not paying rent for a bit, and generally wrecking the place, decided to get awkward when issued with 'go away' papers, and called in the council, who promptly decreed the house was unfit for human habitation, a category 1 health hazard (or some such wording) because.... wait for it....
The balusters on the very nice staircase were over 7 inches apart!
A council official visited, made a report, and sent a stern letter instructing me to rectify this life threatening danger within so many days, or the terrible tenants could instruct the council to fix it, and they'd send me the bill!
I am unsure how having slightly smaller gaps in the baluster would offer much protection to hurling yourself down a flight of stairs, or why the tenants didn't put a baby gate up to stop unattended sprats launching themselves through a 8" gap. I bed the National Trust don't get this kind of bother!
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 10:29, 18 replies)
I rented out an old Victorian terrace house. It was full of nice old features - picture rails, high ceilings, plaster mouldings etc., and a beautiful deep original staircase to the upstairs rooms.
The tenants after not paying rent for a bit, and generally wrecking the place, decided to get awkward when issued with 'go away' papers, and called in the council, who promptly decreed the house was unfit for human habitation, a category 1 health hazard (or some such wording) because.... wait for it....
The balusters on the very nice staircase were over 7 inches apart!
A council official visited, made a report, and sent a stern letter instructing me to rectify this life threatening danger within so many days, or the terrible tenants could instruct the council to fix it, and they'd send me the bill!
I am unsure how having slightly smaller gaps in the baluster would offer much protection to hurling yourself down a flight of stairs, or why the tenants didn't put a baby gate up to stop unattended sprats launching themselves through a 8" gap. I bed the National Trust don't get this kind of bother!
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 10:29, 18 replies)
Prolly curved like those singers came down in old films.
Have to use hardboard.
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 12:03, closed)
Have to use hardboard.
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 12:03, closed)
Frankly if you're going to let the place out to council tenant scum you deserve everything you get.
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 11:43, closed)
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 11:43, closed)
Er... bad correction dude.
Balusters are the vertical shafts which, with the handrail, go together to make the banister.
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 13:38, closed)
Balusters are the vertical shafts which, with the handrail, go together to make the banister.
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 13:38, closed)
You didn't even correct him you arse.
You simply called him thick.
How is he ever going to agree if you don't tell him why he's thick?
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 13:43, closed)
You simply called him thick.
How is he ever going to agree if you don't tell him why he's thick?
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 13:43, closed)
thanks i will NEVER make that mistake again EVER
edit: i wondered why no-one else picked upon it
i assumed they were all blinded with rage at this 'story'
( , Wed 2 Apr 2014, 11:52, closed)
edit: i wondered why no-one else picked upon it
i assumed they were all blinded with rage at this 'story'
( , Wed 2 Apr 2014, 11:52, closed)
I went to bed the National Trust and apparently having lifetime memebership is not cause for them
to put out. The RHS are far more favourable.
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 14:28, closed)
to put out. The RHS are far more favourable.
( , Mon 31 Mar 2014, 14:28, closed)
« Go Back