
I once had a "friend" (I hated his guts) who lost two jobs on the same day - he drunkenly crashed the taxi he was driving when he was supposed to be at his office job. How have you been sacked?
( , Thu 29 May 2014, 13:33)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread

you weren't there.
what you couldn't keep track of was your COLLEAGUES. this is what would happen: viewing at 123 lapwing lane. you sign out the keys, you do the viewing, you put them back on the peg, you sign the keys back in.
then some other fecker takes them for a viewing, doesn't do any of the above, dumps them on the wrong peg/their desk/the side of the car/another property/up their grandmother's chuff.
you have no idea who has them, what they've done with them, but you're the last chump who visibly had them. so you get the blame. and your punishment is usually to stay in the key room sorting through 500 sets of keys until you find them. after a few occasions of getting the blame, people stopped signing them out at all.
the problem was the people. not the keys. people suck. i thought you knew that.
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 10:54, 1 reply)

it's still the fault of those with responsibility, not the dipshits they employ to do the menial work
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 11:00, closed)

and more time checking what they are already paying people to do, which would need checking every single hour of every single day, when you frequently carry out in excess of 30 viewings/repairs per day? or that they should go around after every single inventory has been taken to check it?
sounds commercially sensible.
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 11:08, closed)

not sure how you leaped from that fairly simple and uncontroversial idea to ... whatever it is you just said
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 11:18, closed)

the guy was hopeless and he'd had about four warnings and numerous training sessions. like, how not to report a place as clean and tidy when it has three human turds behind the curtains and skidmarks on the back. so the people in charge decided he was never going to improve. and they made an efficient and competent decision to replace him.
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 11:27, closed)

no idea how it relates to what I said though ... soz
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 11:29, closed)

colleagues misplacing them is only one bit of that merrygoround. the little bastards stick for no reason. they break in the lock. on one occasion, the doorknob fell off, and i was locked in a house with no electricity and 8 people viewing it.
don't judge a girl until you've walked around a one bedroom flat in her stilettos.
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 11:39, closed)

I'm judging the people in charge for not putting systems in place to stop the dopey cunts from doing stupid stuff like licking themselves in flats with inappropriate footwear.
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 12:36, closed)

way to go, mr motivator.
also, i never had to lick myself.
but two of my colleagues did fuck each other in the empty flats sometimes.
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 12:41, closed)

everything that follows will inevitably be a confused strawman bearing no relation to what the other person has said
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 12:57, closed)

what sort of pro? who would appoint you as pro of anything??
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 12:59, closed)

...make sure to wear the correct footwear!
Presumably, kinky boots.
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 12:50, closed)

I'd look at changing the key management system.
I'd like to think that I'd deal with incompetent staff more swiftly, too, although all that cocaine isn't going to snort itself, I suppose.
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 12:53, closed)

( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 12:58, closed)

not sales in grosvenor square
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 13:02, closed)

they have some fancy computer system in place now that records who took them, i think. but any system is only as good as the people doing the day to day stuff. it only takes one fucktard to cause a headache.
( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 13:01, closed)

( , Tue 3 Jun 2014, 20:03, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread