Got 2 years I heard.

( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 18:33, 1 reply)

wow
I wont say it wasnt richly deserved.

It's been weird the past week or so - no frenetic trolling and everyone pointedly not remarking on it

What finally tipped them into action? Do we know?

Either way - I hope this enforced break gives him a chance to actually address whatevers wrong with his life rather than just inflicting his anger on all and sundry. I might condemn his actions but I dont hate him - if anything, pity is nearer the mark.
(Carpe Cyprinidae, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 18:40, closed)

Yeah. Pity his colleagues.
Can you imagine what it must be like to deal with him on a daily basis professionally? Sad, angry little man. He must be a joy in meetings.
(Shimrod, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 18:59, closed)

I am at a possible disadvantage in that my only knowledge of him is from reading a few posts under each of his usernames before putting him on ignore 2.0 again.

I've always assumed him to be long-term unemployed or a self-employed contractor. I cant see how he could spend as much time on here as he does otherwise
(Carpe Cyprinidae, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 19:24, closed)

Sorry - had to come back to this
There is something about this post that irritates the back of my brain like razor wire on a flail. Are you a scientologist or evangelical or something? There's something about the way you write that says "indoctrinated" to me.

"I've always assumed him to be long-term unemployed or a self-employed contractor."

There is something deeply disturbing about your assumption. We are all pretend people here. This is not real.
( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 20:34, closed)

I'm a self-employed contractor in real life.
Is that a bad thing?
(Plague Hedgehog 'posting crap', Sun 19 Oct 2014, 20:37, closed)

not at all. So am I
It was just that I didnt see him having 'colleagues' per se. Because I dont think he'd survive in that environment any longer than a week.
(Carpe Cyprinidae, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 20:49, closed)

Early smirk
what I said before.
( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 20:54, closed)

he's a nice guy who isn't banned
now stop being arseholes.
( mr horrible up yours, dickface, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 20:58, closed)

bit gay mate

(old man river possible lesbian, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 9:24, closed)

I've missed you. Can we hug?
(Bum Bag Fashion Boy Burned a home made pizza on, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 12:57, closed)

My being a self-employed contractor
means that I work alongside a lot more 'colleagues' than I did when I was employed full-time by a company. Perhaps I'm doing it wrong.
(Plague Hedgehog 'posting crap', Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:04, closed)

There is something about this post that irritates the back of my brain like razor wire on a flail.

- Nice turn of phrase.

Are you a scientologist or evangelical or something? There's something about the way you write that says "indoctrinated" to me.

- I may be a colossal idiot when it comes to recognising jokes but not to the extent of accepting the colossal idiocy and regimented noncery of organised religion. No to all three.

There is something deeply disturbing about your assumption. We are all pretend people here. This is not real.

- if you check the context of my post, you'll see I prefaced it by stating that I had almost no grounds for forming any opinion of him that could in any way be based on fact. And that what follows - it should have been obvious - was an internal musing that I freely admitted to have based on no data. Other than the enormous amount of time he managed to spend posting here. Which made me curious.

Is anyone real on here? probably not. Do elements of the real person seep through? of course. Nobody can spend several years regularly contributing to - or innhis case, detrimenting to - a forum without leaving a massive stamp of their own real personality/identity all over it



in my opinion.
(Carpe Cyprinidae, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:17, closed)

Thank you
For your courteous and considered reply. My implications were taken from the style of your post. If you don't want to be misrepresented then be precise and objective. If you're taking the piss it doesn't matter; but expect collateral damage.The whole Shambles thing raises questions of acceptability, but come on. If you're posting on here expect to get your bollocks shot off.
( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:27, closed)

I'd like to thank you both
for having a calm, sensible and civil discussion about this, rather than resorting to the kind of verminous trolling which has infested this place of late.
(Plague Hedgehog 'posting crap', Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:31, closed)

Ta

( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:36, closed)

An Englishman, an Irishman and a Jew were havinga drink together
- a perfect example of racial integration.
(zebideedoodah likes florence but prefers venice, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:53, closed)

no it isn't'.

( d.r._and_quinch when will you be famous?, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:57, closed)

Quite right

( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 22:00, closed)

I know.

( d.r._and_quinch when will you be famous?, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 22:02, closed)

mulsim isnt a race!!!!!

( drimble he'd been white, he'd been black, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 23:48, closed)

what??

(zebideedoodah likes florence but prefers venice, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 0:44, closed)

Oh dear
Did you click the right Reply button? Look at he news. Or something.
( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 19:23, closed)

I dont really believe in coincidences
I guess its possible they did it to save him being prosecuted and ending up reaching down for the soap at a badly chosen moment but it seemed a bit too.. neat?
(Carpe Cyprinidae, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 19:25, closed)

DAMMIT!!!!!
Sorry, took a minute for me to see the joke there

i am an idiot.
(Carpe Cyprinidae, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 19:29, closed)

^This^

( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 19:36, closed)

"I hope this enforced break gives him a chance to actually address whatever's wrong with his life rather than just inflicting his anger on all and sundry."

Not likely. Being banned the first time just made him come back 1000% angrier.
( .Yeti. El amor en los tiempos del cólera, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 20:47, closed)

Well, 100% anyway.

( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:08, closed)

No, I stick by my hyperbolic 1000%.

( .Yeti. El amor en los tiempos del cólera, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:21, closed)

On reflection
I'd go for 78.6% parabolic.
( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:43, closed)

I'll see your 78.6% parabolic
and raise you 0.94 albedo.
( .Yeti. El amor en los tiempos del cólera, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:48, closed)

Well, that's easy
I'll give you a magnitude 2.37
( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:52, closed)

reflections on his albedo
may prove self-referential
(Carpe Cyprinidae, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:53, closed)

That's tautological

( CharlesDexterWard no rush eh, Sun 19 Oct 2014, 21:56, closed)

I had to fire a bloke once for having no albedo.
I said "It's no reflection on you."
( .Yeti. El amor en los tiempos del cólera, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 11:07, closed)

For a moment there I thought you said "set fire to".
It was even more amusing.

(Good pun, though.)
(Shimrod, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 18:35, closed)

Thanks.
Setting fire to a bloke can be the alternative, Clockwork Orange version.
( .Yeti. El amor en los tiempos del cólera, Mon 20 Oct 2014, 19:45, closed)