B3ta Villain of the Year 2010
We voted WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as B3ta's Person of the Year. Who do you have as 2010's scoundrel and why?
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 12:34)
We voted WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange as B3ta's Person of the Year. Who do you have as 2010's scoundrel and why?
( , Thu 23 Dec 2010, 12:34)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
aw diddums
people are going to disagree with your pro war bullshit as you cheer from your armchair. get used to it you little cunt
( , Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:32, 1 reply)
people are going to disagree with your pro war bullshit as you cheer from your armchair. get used to it you little cunt
( , Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:32, 1 reply)
which 'pro war bullshit'?
Honestly, I think differences of opinion are often helpful, and discourse should, in most cases, be encouraged. Yours, however, seldom (if ever) rises above the level of crude simplification, pathetic over-generalisation, and risible playground swears; you're not exactly "Question Time" material, are you?
( , Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:38, closed)
says the fuckwit
who begins the disscusion by instead of challenging the logic of my post to instead opt for just calling me a whiney sixth former. get used to people calling you a pathetic little cunt. Im sure it isn't the first time. Muppet
( , Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:41, closed)
who begins the disscusion by instead of challenging the logic of my post to instead opt for just calling me a whiney sixth former. get used to people calling you a pathetic little cunt. Im sure it isn't the first time. Muppet
( , Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:41, closed)
there really wasn't any, besides a poorly worded sub-Donovan rant along the lines of 'oh boo hoo soldiers are all irredeemably evil and it's all their personal fault and also they eat babies honest'.
Actually, I think by comparing your understanding to that of the average sixth-former, I was doing the latter a disservice.
( , Mon 27 Dec 2010, 22:45, closed)
ah so I was meant
to deduct this arguement from that 1 line insult . Prat.
in your desperation to backtrack from your first insult you're now trying to convince me you had a valid objection to my post. yet you can't even fake being a smartarse very well.
If im sixth formish, as you say, going by the argumenent you've put up so far you must be fucking infant school.
go back and read the post you were replying to. When did I ever fucking say all soldiers were evil you utter tosspot.
forcing assumptions and even not reading my post correctly just makes you look a fucking prat my friend. kind of takes the shine off that self righteousness when you can't even understand the intial post you're replying to you soft shit.
my point was valid. alot of soldiers refused to fight, these are the ones that should be hero worshipped in my opinion. That was clear from the first post . you're either blind or just a thick twat. I did't say they are evil, but I do say every soldier takes responsibility for his actions, no one forces you to drop a bomb or pull a trigger when you know civilians are in danger. Given the absolute obscene fucking waste of innocent life in Afghansitan the piss poor excuse that they are just doing the right thing and following orders doesn't fucking wash in my opinion. alot of them there are aware of how wrong it is but do it because of the public support.
if we truely cared for the lives of these people putting on the uniform and more importantly for the thousands of innocents who have no choice in Iraq and Afghanistan then we have to show them our digust for their own good.
No doubt a fair percentage actually disagree with the war , but they think because of the huge public support they have an obligation to be there.
By showing our lack of support they would question their own motives more and without the support behind them may even rebel.
Even seeing how the MOD treats returning maimed soldiers is not enough to wake them up.
go on then genius, blind me with the logic of your counter arguement, or rather do what you've been doing : misread the post and invent something you say I've said and respond to that. Muppet
( , Mon 27 Dec 2010, 23:02, closed)
to deduct this arguement from that 1 line insult . Prat.
in your desperation to backtrack from your first insult you're now trying to convince me you had a valid objection to my post. yet you can't even fake being a smartarse very well.
If im sixth formish, as you say, going by the argumenent you've put up so far you must be fucking infant school.
go back and read the post you were replying to. When did I ever fucking say all soldiers were evil you utter tosspot.
forcing assumptions and even not reading my post correctly just makes you look a fucking prat my friend. kind of takes the shine off that self righteousness when you can't even understand the intial post you're replying to you soft shit.
my point was valid. alot of soldiers refused to fight, these are the ones that should be hero worshipped in my opinion. That was clear from the first post . you're either blind or just a thick twat. I did't say they are evil, but I do say every soldier takes responsibility for his actions, no one forces you to drop a bomb or pull a trigger when you know civilians are in danger. Given the absolute obscene fucking waste of innocent life in Afghansitan the piss poor excuse that they are just doing the right thing and following orders doesn't fucking wash in my opinion. alot of them there are aware of how wrong it is but do it because of the public support.
if we truely cared for the lives of these people putting on the uniform and more importantly for the thousands of innocents who have no choice in Iraq and Afghanistan then we have to show them our digust for their own good.
No doubt a fair percentage actually disagree with the war , but they think because of the huge public support they have an obligation to be there.
By showing our lack of support they would question their own motives more and without the support behind them may even rebel.
Even seeing how the MOD treats returning maimed soldiers is not enough to wake them up.
go on then genius, blind me with the logic of your counter arguement, or rather do what you've been doing : misread the post and invent something you say I've said and respond to that. Muppet
( , Mon 27 Dec 2010, 23:02, closed)
Danny, you really are taking the bait far too easily.
Chill out a bit.
( , Tue 28 Dec 2010, 9:00, closed)
Chill out a bit.
( , Tue 28 Dec 2010, 9:00, closed)
well if he is, he's my type of cunt
what a post full of sense Mr Fireman :D
( , Tue 28 Dec 2010, 13:15, closed)
what a post full of sense Mr Fireman :D
( , Tue 28 Dec 2010, 13:15, closed)
you have good taste
I like you and your convictions, don't let the little gobshites get you down fella
( , Wed 29 Dec 2010, 21:51, closed)
I like you and your convictions, don't let the little gobshites get you down fella
( , Wed 29 Dec 2010, 21:51, closed)
oh the individual gobshites don't bother me
but the fact that as a society there are so many so easily led into supporting the actions of those that we would condemn if a different coloured flag was being waved about does tend to depress me somewhat :(
( , Thu 30 Dec 2010, 5:55, closed)
but the fact that as a society there are so many so easily led into supporting the actions of those that we would condemn if a different coloured flag was being waved about does tend to depress me somewhat :(
( , Thu 30 Dec 2010, 5:55, closed)
still sore are we?
better a cunt that a gobshite :)
do fuck off, there's a good chap
( , Wed 29 Dec 2010, 21:43, closed)
better a cunt that a gobshite :)
do fuck off, there's a good chap
( , Wed 29 Dec 2010, 21:43, closed)
Anybody care to summarise that?
far too much to read.
I suspect 'fuck off, you cunting muppet' just about covers it.
( , Wed 29 Dec 2010, 10:36, closed)
far too much to read.
I suspect 'fuck off, you cunting muppet' just about covers it.
( , Wed 29 Dec 2010, 10:36, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread