Regardless of legality, which is all you seem concerned about here, you fucked a child.

( drimble he'd been white, he'd been black, Mon 10 Nov 2014, 19:10, 1 reply)

Errr, no.
She was physically fully mature. (And a cracking pair of tits from what I remember.) I guarantee that any other red-blooded male in their early 20s would have done exactly what I did when she was practically throwing herself at me.

So would you have a problem with, say, a 22-year-old fucking a 16-year-old?
(RabidRodent I'm the person your mother warned you about, Mon 10 Nov 2014, 19:13, closed)

Yes, because anyone under the age of 18 is a child.
And 'physically fully mature' does not mean mentally and emotionally. So get the fuck away from the sixth form gates, you creepy old perv.
( drimble he'd been white, he'd been black, Mon 10 Nov 2014, 19:17, closed)

Nothing wrong with someone in their early 20s nailing a 16-year-old...
...provided of course she's a mature 16 and isn't being manipulated.

As I said above, I'm 30-something now, and I wouldn't bang anyone under 20. And, to be honest, even that's pushing it a bit.
(RabidRodent I'm the person your mother warned you about, Mon 10 Nov 2014, 19:57, closed)

And there are people who say romance is dead.

(Plague Hedgehog 'posting crap', Mon 10 Nov 2014, 20:42, closed)

I'm sure your 'long-term partner' would be overjoyed to hear this information.
It doesn't matter, when she finally discovers your sustained penchant for noncing she'll dump you anyway.
(Dr Doctor Can't you see I'm burning burning?, Tue 11 Nov 2014, 9:01, closed)

Mm, always thought that an interesting point about the age of consent
is that it doesn't account for disparity in ages, i.e. take into account the opportunity of manipulation into the act that an older person would naturally have.

I'd say that in France, 15 is fine - but with a partner up to a certain age... what age that would be I don't know. Same for the UK, I'd advocate a lowering of the age of consent to 15, with the same rules.
( rofl harris, Wed 12 Nov 2014, 14:04, closed)

I'd advocate raising it to 25.
Based purely on the type of people that tend to have children before they're 25.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Wed 12 Nov 2014, 16:14, closed)

Or how about
compulsory birth control for anyone under 25?
(RabidRodent I'm the person your mother warned you about, Wed 12 Nov 2014, 16:36, closed)

You mean the so-called "Romeo & Juliet" laws?
I'd be in favour of lowering it to 14, even if there was a "provided the older party is no more than [for example] 5 years older, otherwise 16" clause.

Cos, you know, 14 and 15-year-olds are out shagging each other's brains out anyway. I can think of only one person I know who has reached the age of 18 (tomorrow in fact) and has retained her virginity.

Quite honestly nowadays any interaction with anyone younger than early 20s makes me think "you immature little brat". I guess that's what age does to you.
(RabidRodent I'm the person your mother warned you about, Wed 12 Nov 2014, 16:36, closed)

You do seem to be something of an authority on the sexual practices of children.
I'm pretty sure I neither know nor care what most teenagers I know are doing with their genitals.
(Plague Hedgehog 'posting crap', Wed 12 Nov 2014, 18:37, closed)

I'm trying really hard here to find something positive
about you based purely on your contributions to this forum. The best I can come up with is that you have been winding us all up from the beginning and that your 'views' are designed to provoke hostile responses which feed whatever it is you crave.
Any other interpretation of your "I'm not a paedo but here's my paedo diary so far" spiel would cause me to want to stab you in the eye with a fork, therefore adding nothing useful to this debate. i really hope I'm wrong but if not please post your address. Thanks
( edjogs Collared doves are shit., Thu 13 Nov 2014, 22:35, closed)