You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 6199176 (Thread)

Really not, I've got lallies.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:40, archived)
that word means nothing to me.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:41, archived)
Tits. Hooters. Breasts. Shirt potatoes.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:41, archived)
On your face?

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:42, archived)
Is that where Mrs Neptune keeps hers?
Oh I get it AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA yeah I'm not pretty move on.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:43, archived)
That's why I didn't understand what she meant.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:43, archived)
I'm glad it's not just me.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:46, archived)
I've reread everything I've said and it makes sense.
Unless you two never see anything below your necks in a mirror.

Never fucking mind, eh?
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:47, archived)
I'll highlight my problem shall I?
You: "Sour faced bints"
Me: "that's the mirror"
You: "Really not, I've got lallies"
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:49, archived)
I'm not the sour faced bint in question
because I have, amongst other things she regrettably doesn't, tits.

Bints extend lower than their faces.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:50, archived)
I think we're on a hiding to nothing with this one.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:50, archived)
I thought she meant she isn't the Sour faced bint she has in mind, because the sour faced bint has tiny tits.
or something like that.

I don't know, I'm just agreeing with her becuase she's a girl.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:51, archived)
Well at least you got it, Gonz.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:51, archived)
*stares at your nice bewbies*

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:53, archived)
That's taking it a bit far
but cheers.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:53, archived)
Meh, at least I'm honest and knew what you were talking about
*pulls a lemon sucking face*
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:56, archived)
:D you're not a pillock, that's why.
Lovely, lovely DG.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:56, archived)
Ohh, I was right, fair enough.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:52, archived)
I know what you meant,
but that's nothing to do with what you said.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:54, archived)
I'd just like to say here that I've not been paying attention to this sub thread
But I'm going to glare very sternly at you all.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:57, archived)
Don't you glare sternly at me
just because Rain Man and Captain Bumsexy have decided they want a go.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:58, archived)
It's the fight JMG was hoping for
But he's not here to see it. Oh online tragedy.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:59, archived)
This is hardly a fight
This is two boyos having a brainmelt and me being incredulous.


edit: anyway, I've got to go- bye all.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:00, archived)
I can already see we're in for a thought-provoking, margin-brushing exercise in petty pedantry!

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:53, archived)
Pick a side you cunt.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:54, archived)
You know someone with their sour face below their neck?
Crikey.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:50, archived)
Just because someone only mentioned a person's face,
that doesn't mean they don't have anything other than a face. FFS.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:51, archived)
I don't think these two have much experience of women below the face, TBH.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:52, archived)
Well, I'm gay and he's shit.
So, no.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:53, archived)
I should hope so, being as girlretarded as that.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:54, archived)
:(
I've had sex with an integer amount of ladies.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:55, archived)
After all this I refuse to believe that.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:56, archived)
At least claim a natural number of lays and then we can debate whether 0 is a natural number.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:56, archived)
MoT explains it better than me.
b3ta.com/talk/6199203
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:53, archived)
My reply just there adequately responds to that as well.
I'd expect anyone not autistic to imagine a person with a face, when a face is mentioned, not an entirely disembodied face.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:54, archived)
Being sour faced and having horrible/tiny tits are independent statements.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:56, archived)
yes, they are.
and she made both of them. what?
She might not have mentioned the tits in the first statement, but that doesn't mean they weren't there.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:56, archived)
I think you should draw a venn diagram.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:57, archived)
Yes, but having and not having breasts is a way of distinguishing between people.
Hence, seeing that the sour faced bint has no tits whereas you do, means you know the bint is not you.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:57, archived)
YES THIS

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:58, archived)
That's more for the side of 'how do you not get this?'
which is good, I thought I was going a bit mad.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:59, archived)
Her first post didn't mention the tits.
Therefore saying "No, I've got lallies" does not refute the original claim.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 17:59, archived)
Well personally, I'm just enjoying the fact we're all talking about Captain Wow's tits here

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:00, archived)
Yes it does, if the sour faced bint originally mentioned doesn't have tits.
Admittedly, it doesn't prove whether Wow is or is not a sour faced bint, but that's not what's apparently an issue here, it's whether she was the sour faced bint that she saw.
I love pointless arguments.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:01, archived)
Original statement "Sour faced bints that glare at me for no particular reason."
No tits were mentioned.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:02, archived)
She didn't have to mention that to use it as an observation later.
Or do you always begin a conversation by stating all the facts which might conceivably be referred to later on?
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:03, archived)
I keep a minutes for every social encounter I have.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:06, archived)
It refutes the claim "that's the mirror"
because the person in the mirror would have tits, because she has tits.

The argument runs thus:
1. observation: person looks at me who possesses property "sour-faced"
2. hypothesis: person is my reflection
3. observation: I have tits, but person has no tits
4. therefore: person is not my reflection
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:01, archived)
Oh for fuck sake mate, let it go, it doesn't fucking matter!

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:01, archived)
I know it doesn't matter.
nothing on b3ta matters though, so why stop doing something that doesn't matter?
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:03, archived)
Quiet now.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:03, archived)
Click hide/ignore.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:05, archived)
I thought you'd be with us, Woodside, I really did.
I'm so disappointed.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:06, archived)
It's very hard to pick sides
when you're struggling to stay awakkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 18:07, archived)