b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 6260341 (Thread)

Good god, I hope not
I thought b3ta had hit a low, but no, you guys managed to drag it down ever further.
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:06, archived)
Why is it so fucking terrible?

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:06, archived)
Are you joking me?
It's unfunny, tedious bullshit.
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:07, archived)
The board was different for a few hours, big deal.

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:08, archived)
The board was a frantic race of tedious egotistical self-absorbed witterings
with the combined intelligence of earwig shit and the comedy content of cardboard. You did it because you loved having a post at the top, it made you feel important, like you weren't background noise for a change. Instead, it came out like all the radios in Curry's being turned up full blast at the same time, only tuned to different stations, and then flicking your fingers Ali G style and saying "wicked rave, man, innit."

It's a fucking embarassment that any of you could gain enjoyment from such an exercise.
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:11, archived)
That's it, let it out.

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:12, archived)
Haha, yeah', I got a theasorous to !

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:13, archived)
I got a T rex.
I kick your arse.
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:14, archived)
is there any word there that wouldn't be part of someone's normal vocabulary?

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:14, archived)
Ok, this is how a layman would say that.
The board was filled with attention seekin' cunts.
They're quite thick and ain't funny. You joined in to be near the top, made you feel big for once. It came out like a dodgy radio on full blast while actin' like a ru'boy.

It's quite embarssin' that you reckon that's a laugh.
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:20, archived)
That's not layman
that's inner city cuntonese.
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:23, archived)
Shame you didn't get a dictionary too

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:14, archived)
RED MISERY!

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:09, archived)
What's your point?

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:10, archived)
I'm with you on this <font color="#0000FF">*</font>, and not just because I fancy you more.

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:09, archived)
That is taking pandering to a whole new level.

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:10, archived)
/talk has been unfunny, tedious bullshit for over 6 months, example:
SOMEONE: ACTUAL THREAD
SEXFACE: ROFL LOL
FRIZ: LETS SPAM QOTW
GONZO: I HAD THIS FOR DINNER
SEXFACE: LOL DINNER THREAD LOL
JMG: FATTIES
MONGYCHOPS: PUSHING JMG DOWN THE BOARD
ROB: NEWSLETTER
FRIZ: PUSHING ROB DOWN THE BOARD LOL
BALDMONKEY: LOL LET'S PISS OFF QOTW
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:11, archived)
*clicks*

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:12, archived)
Except tonight we did it with @ signs.

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:13, archived)
haha

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:13, archived)
Over six months and you still keep coming back.
It says more about you than it does about us.
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:15, archived)
Because for every 20 shit posts, there is actually a good conversation that makes the whole thing worth it.

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:18, archived)
When it used to be every 5 shit posts

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:19, archived)
It's rubbesh
Obviously
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:07, archived)
I know, this has probably been the most fun /talk has been since 6,000,000 day

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:07, archived)
Back to food and football threads.

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:08, archived)
So you prefer b3ta when it's like twitter, and not like b3ta.
Have you considered trying twitter?
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:10, archived)
It was something different, it didn't work, oh well.

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:13, archived)
Twitter is a load of fucking bollocks
and so I didn't particularly want to see bollocksy twitter esque posts knocking around on /talk.

/fat and upset online
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:14, archived)
It was pretty intensely dull

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:08, archived)
I quite enjoyed it, the bit I caught.
How about that - different strokes and everything.
(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:09, archived)
Oh don't be such a mardybum.

(, Sun 28 Jun 2009, 22:07, archived)