data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:23, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
'wah wah wah. but i don't LIKE this comic. why doesn't anyone agree with me?!'
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:26, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
it's impossible to like something so smug and witless
it's the Wormulus of webcomics
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:29, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
i don't doubt that those strips have jokes in, but i wouldn't know where to look!
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:44, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
www.gilgamesh.zen.co.uk/images/xkcd.gif
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:41, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
as long as you were consistently creative with the swearing
there's one somewhere that has no dialogue at all. just some shapes with incomprehensible squiggles.
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:46, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:48, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
the xkcd guy would probably even link to you and your hit count would go through the roof
can i get a cut of the profits please?
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:51, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
used to read that years ago
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 15:02, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
yep no one agrees with me
don't bother making counterpoints, just mock, that's the internet way!
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:31, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
you're ignoring the fact that people do like it and posting a mockery based link
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:37, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
see, i said it up there
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:40, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
i'd say each of these opinions are as irrelevant as each other
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:43, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
it explains why it's bad rather neatly without resorting to as much name calling as i have here
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:48, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
that doesn't sound right to me
i'm pretty sure this comes down to personal opinion
did you form yours then have it enforced by this 'review' or just let the internet tell you what to think?
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:53, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
the review was written by someone with an IQ less than that of a golden retriever.
The major approach of the review is that it's rubbish because a)the drawing is poor (moot point, the author has never claimed points for drawing skills) and b)it's rubbish because if you understand the maths or the science you suffer from aspergers (which is a rather childish thing to think, really).
It's basically retard bully level "hate what you don't understand"
If you don't get the science, you might not find it funny. That's fine. But only a terminally self-obssessed idiot assumes that because they don't understand it, it might not be funny to those that do.
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:54, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
does that make me a bully?
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:59, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 15:06, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
how on earth can the subject matter of comedy be defined as autistic?
you don't find it funny. Cool. But that doesn't mean it isn't to others. Even though this is the internet, and this may come as a shock to you, yours isn't the only valid opinion out there.
People find humour in whatever they want. and those that work with that kind of maths or science day in, day out, are likely to find humour in it. It's no more or less "autistic" than finding humour in any work-related subject.
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 15:06, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
and i'm sorry, but it is still intensely nerdy to find fourier transforms and poisson distributions funny, no matter what you say
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 15:23, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
Some people (myself included) like it. Some people don't.
Spouting sweeping generalisations just makes you look like a bit of a tit.
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:57, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
that this comic was my favourite one in the whole wide world
would you put down the tastes as subjective or would you think i was a creepy furry inflation fetishist?
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 15:02, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
as opposed to the "smug" writing.
Does a comic really have to be well drawn to be a comic? So can it have pretty pictures but shit writing and still be called a comic?
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:48, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
the difference is being regarded as a good comic
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:49, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
a comic with good writing can be really let down by bad art, and the reverse is true also
although in the crazy world of webcomics i don't think it matters too much either way, people will still praise you unequivocally no matter what turds you plop out
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:53, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
"I don't understand the science, therefore it's rubbish"
In case the reviewer (and you) missed the fucking massive tagline in the comic, it's a maths and science comic. Not understanding it doesn't make it not funny full stop, just not funny to you.
And since that review basically says "anyone who understands science or maths has Aspergers' " then you'll forgive me for suggesting that there isn't really any need to counterpoint an opinion that fuckwitted that it might as well have been written by a 5 year old.
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:49, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
and xkcd is a shithole piece of arsecunt piss-rag written by autistic pseudo-intellectual shitcunts
fuck xkcd man, fuck xkcd right in the ear
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:54, archived)