b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 7221634 (Thread)

I hear Wednesday is where all the cool kids hang out

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:19, archived)

cool kids pricks
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:22, archived)
wednesday is only good for 2 for 1 at the cinema, frankly

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:24, archived)
You needlessly limit your mind, Manny.
also, I'm not Frank
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:29, archived)
you say that, but have you looked at the space jam website lately?
www2.warnerbros.com/spacejam/movie/jam.htm
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:30, archived)
Thank you so very much for this

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:59, archived)
no problem, lurky

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:10, archived)
This.
Alright little bro?
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:30, archived)
YEAH, I'M BACK AT WORK!
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:30, archived)
All days are happy.
"Sunday, Monday, happy days
Tuesday, Wednesday, happy days
Thursday, Friday, happy days
Saturday, what a day
Rockin' all week with you."
QED.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:31, archived)
well clearly not saturday
the author would appear to suggest it's just midly ridiculous or incredulous.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:33, archived)
I interpret it as
the author rocks all week with 'you' (whoever 'you' is) and all the other days are happy, so we can infer that Saturday is also happy, as the rockin' continues apparently unabated into Saturday.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:35, archived)
would this stand up
in a court of law? I think not.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:49, archived)
We're going to need a ruling on this.
Anyone qualified?
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:54, archived)
where is INTERNETLAWYERMAN?

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:57, archived)
Off saving the world, no doubt.

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:04, archived)

he's getting frisbee qc to do something I expect, like lick the headlights on his aston clean, or polish his teaspoons
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:05, archived)
Sorry I'm late
I've been licking and polishing stuff updating the blog.
How can I help?
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:12, archived)
you need to say
I am right.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:14, archived)
Okay: "I am right"
That'll be £60 please.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:15, archived)
Are you referring to "saturday, what a day"
and that you think that it is not part of the rest of the week in relation to how the other days are described?
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:17, archived)
He is.
Prove him wrong, Mr QC.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:31, archived)
I would be interested to see Acid Kewpie's reasoning,
but my learned friend Mr AaaaaaaaaarrrdvaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAARK! may have a case.

The phrase 'Rockin' all week with you' makes it hard for one to believe that Saturday is not one of the days of the 'Rockin-week'.

However, this is not what Acid Kewpie is challenging, but rather that the Saturday is not explicitly described as a happy day.

As it is a civil matter it does not have to be proven 'beyond all reasonable doubt', but rather 'on the balance of probabilities'. The representation is that Saturday (while being described as 'what a day') belongs to the rest of the week as a 'Happy' day.
We would have to look at the deeper meaning and the intention of the author's statement: would it be his intention to identify every day except saturday as 'happy', while labelling every day as 'Rocking', also?

On the balance of probabilities, it would be hard to maintain that the author intended to single it out as not a 'happy day'. Mr Aardvark's case is a strong one.

obiter: in considering the construction of the verse, it is the opinion of this commentator that to explicitly label saturday as a 'happy day', after listing all the others would greatly disturb the flow of the verse. It is the belief that the songwriter abridged the 'saturday' line, on the (evidently unsafe) belief that nobody would misinterpret it as not a 'happy' day
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 11:01, archived)
Oh LOL
I think I am going to have to click this
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 11:03, archived)
Booya!
Lawyered.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 11:15, archived)
Glad I could help
*sips chocolate milk*

sshhh
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 12:10, archived)
STOP DELETING STUFF

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 12:22, archived)
I SAID SHHH SOO SSHHH!

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 12:25, archived)
Well i was not referring to the situation being a civil issue
Clearly this is a most serious issue, and the full weight of criminal law should be behind it.

I know well that should this end up in small claims court that the judge would say "pfft, don't be daft" but a judge with a proper dusty wig would have different aspects to think about.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 11:46, archived)
You'd still need to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that it wasn't meant in that way.
If anything, your case would be worse.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 11:54, archived)
bargain!

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:45, archived)
you're not INTERNETLAWYERMAN
and you never will be
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:24, archived)
well, i can hardly argue with henry winkler

(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:34, archived)
I wouldn't argue with him.
He was on Something For The Weekend yesterday, he's LOVELY. Fonz FACT: Double F and me got married on his 65th birthday.
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 9:58, archived)
wowee
fonzie be with you
(, Mon 20 Jun 2011, 10:11, archived)