b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 7338147 (Thread)

You recognise the limits of science? WOW, quite a statement there. What ALL of science?

(I helped save b3ta! mark morrisons prison shoes I love Willie, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:52, archived)
Science is limited to the modelling of phenomena
for the sake of the prediction of phenomena. It tells us what is, but not why it is. It tells us what we can do, but it doesn't tell us what we should do.
(I helped save b3ta! Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 1:59, archived)
Why do you need to be told stuff all the time?

(I helped save b3ta! TFD is sporting this season's finest necropants, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:03, archived)
I wouldn't have been able to work out all of modern physics by myself,
being told things is actually rather useful.
(I helped save b3ta! Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:06, archived)
But everything?
All of what to do and why to do it?
(I helped save b3ta! TFD is sporting this season's finest necropants, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:10, archived)
Yeah,
if I've got to cut someone's head off I'd like to be able to reassure myself somehow that I'm doing the right thing and not just acting on a whim.
(I helped save b3ta! Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:12, archived)
Why not just not cut anyone's head off?
Dur.
(I helped save b3ta! TFD is sporting this season's finest necropants, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:16, archived)
Are you now saying that morality is something you can only derive from religion?

(I helped save b3ta! mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:06, archived)
I don't know if I want to get into this again,
but the short answer is "yes".
(I helped save b3ta! Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:08, archived)
So are we now going to talk about the deaths religion causes and then say something like, Hitler was an atheist?
If you truly believe you can only gain a sense of morals from religion, then I sort of feel sorry for you.
(I helped save b3ta! mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:10, archived)
maybe she means religion in terms that
all morality is essentially made up, and that IS religion? maybe.
(I helped save b3ta! Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:14, archived)
Hitler was a neo-pagan,
but moving on. People have their own consciences, and there are social constructs and acceptable codes of behaviour etc.. But how do we evaluate these things? We know that under Hitler (for instance) ordinary people did all sorts of things. We know that in some Islamic countries they cut your head off for being gay, and that in various places female circumcision occurs. These are just a couple of examples of moral problems that even the "new atheists" of today would like some kind of objective answer.

Various religions have got a lot of things wrong at different times, I'll admit, but we can't expect them to change for no reason. If we want to be able to say that such-and-such is right or wrong, we need a reason. Conscience and social custom just doesn't cut it, despite what the subjectivists like to pretend. And science doesn't help us, because it is impartial and makes no value judgments. Utilitarianism as per John Stuart Mill was a good effort but it has loose ends all over the place. The only thing that can tie them up as I see it, is the Will of God. It's only because God made the Universe for a reason and not arbitrarily or by accident that there can be any sense of what anyone "ought" to do.
(I helped save b3ta! Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:20, archived)
How do you explain my morals then, in the absence of a belief in God?
Or has he given them me regardless of whether I believe in him or not?
(I helped save b3ta! mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:23, archived)
Conscience and social custom, probably.
I doubt you derived them logically from scientific knowledge, at any rate.
(I helped save b3ta! Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:30, archived)
Could I not have derived them from personal experience?
A base example such as "If I touch fire, it hurts me. It must hurt others too and I would not want to subject someone to the pain I felt."
(I helped save b3ta! mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:45, archived)
why wouldn't you want to subject others to pain?
why does what you want decide what ought to be?
where does morality come into it? I'll tell you what does come into it. Empathy and sympathy, or compassion if you will. This is natural, but there's no logic in it.
(I helped save b3ta! Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:50, archived)
ruh-roh

(I helped save b3ta! Aardvark and so at last, I understood, Thu 6 Oct 2011, 2:08, archived)