b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 8432218 (Thread)

I think you'll find that the sun is minding its own business,
and that it's the movement of the Earth that's causing the issue.

Perhaps you could move to the ISS and set it in an orbit to stay on the dark side, that should solve this.
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 9:56, archived)
GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT

(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 10:20, archived)
That wouldn't work, any geostationary orbit will still face the sun at some point.
It'd need to be at the L2 Lagrange point.
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 10:30, archived)
Cunt would just keep losing his visor, though.

(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 10:32, archived)
Oh yeah my mistake but is the opposite type of orbit even possible?

(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 10:34, archived)
Depends what you mean by "opposite"
The L1 Lagrange point is on the opposite side of the Earth from the L2 point, always facing the sun, if that's what you mean.
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 10:37, archived)
I mean stationary at in a point in space
so yeah I guess that's what I'm getting at.
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 10:52, archived)
Can't we just blow up the sun?
Most problems are easily and harmlessly solved with explosives.
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 10:57, archived)
If we blew up the sun everything would be absolutely fine and unchanged on Earth
for about 8 minutes, anyway.
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 11:11, archived)
Unless you blew up the sun with sufficient energy to completely disperse it in space,
I think it would rapidly reform, because there's still a whole stellar mass in roughly the same space at the same time, blowing it up is just making it a lot less dense, briefly. Its centre of mass would still be in the same place...

It would be pretty angry for the next few billion years or so but subterranean microbes would probably survive and life would begin again.
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 19:35, archived)
There is no such thing as stationary, not really.
If you somehow managed to achieve "true stationary", space dust would rip you to shreds in seconds.
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 12:44, archived)
There is no pen

(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 13:41, archived)
Stationary in relation to the rotating earth.

(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 13:55, archived)
You'd have to work out if that location would still be close enough for the Earth to still block the Sun.

(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 18:21, archived)
FFS you people need to get good at KSP.
You can have a sun-synchronous orbit that processes to match the rotation and orbit of the Earth's orientation relative to the sun.

The normal way to do it is to keep line of sight with the sun, to power the solar panels or to directly observe the sun itself. The same orbit offset by 180 degrees would keep the satellite in the Earth's shadow.
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 19:27, archived)
Meh, science trolling isn't the fun it used to be.

(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 19:37, archived)
It is when you fall for it.

(, Sat 30 Nov 2024, 12:04, archived)
Please cite examples.

(, Sat 30 Nov 2024, 15:47, archived)
GEOSTATIONARY ORBIT


hang on
(, Fri 29 Nov 2024, 18:20, archived)