
I'm talking about blame, not compensation
Sony aren't to blame for cunts being cunts which is what most people seem to be doing around t'internet
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:01,
archived)
Sony aren't to blame for cunts being cunts which is what most people seem to be doing around t'internet

rather than the fault of the cunts who wrote it?
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:05,
archived)


n.b. That's in reply to your articular statement and not in context of the thread.
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:09,
archived)

I would go so far as to project that I would believe that to be a significant part of the relationship that people value when employing Sony by buying their service.
Thus if Sony fail to keep out hackers, then it is Sony's failing, and they are to be blamed for that failing.
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:08,
archived)
Thus if Sony fail to keep out hackers, then it is Sony's failing, and they are to be blamed for that failing.

and I am saying Sony are not to blame for cunts being cunts
they did not "give" information away, it was stolen.
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:14,
archived)
they did not "give" information away, it was stolen.

If I was one of the people who had had their data nicked, I may well be tempted to describe it as Sony "giving" it away.
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:25,
archived)

congratulations for getting to the point :D
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:28,
archived)

"blaming sony is like telling a rape victim she was asking for it"
Which is disingenuous at best.
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:30,
archived)
Which is disingenuous at best.

a) are you having a polite conversation?
or b) are you just dragging this out because you have something against me (as you seem to keep doing this when I dare to speak on this site)?
I wasn't being disingenuous, I genuinely believe that people are levelling their blame at the wrong place and stupidly dared to comment on it which is obviously worse than thread deletion and spam. Sony did not simply give away information, they did not stand out on a street randomly handing it out to strangers. And they did not ask to be targeted in the same way a rape victim does not ask to be raped.
Are you saying a rape victim is to blame for not carrying a gun to defend themselves? or that they "gave away" a sexual liaison?
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:38,
archived)
or b) are you just dragging this out because you have something against me (as you seem to keep doing this when I dare to speak on this site)?
I wasn't being disingenuous, I genuinely believe that people are levelling their blame at the wrong place and stupidly dared to comment on it which is obviously worse than thread deletion and spam. Sony did not simply give away information, they did not stand out on a street randomly handing it out to strangers. And they did not ask to be targeted in the same way a rape victim does not ask to be raped.
Are you saying a rape victim is to blame for not carrying a gun to defend themselves? or that they "gave away" a sexual liaison?

or god help her!!!

I think the people who pay certainly should get something for the downtime inconvenience
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:52,
archived)

I honestly think Sony need to kiss everyones arse over this not just the + owners, free stuff all round

but it's an annoyance to change the password.
just hope it isn't worse than that and card details have remained safe as they are currently officially saying.
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:04,
archived)
just hope it isn't worse than that and card details have remained safe as they are currently officially saying.

You're going to have to get your mother to change her maiden name
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:07,
archived)

But won't they have us log in against our MAC addresses or something, to verify it is us and not some scum bag?
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:07,
archived)

but I can wait..as long as they fix it and make the security stronger
I don't care how long it's down for
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:08,
archived)
I don't care how long it's down for

( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:11,
archived)

I'm the same..gimme a shout when it's back up and running

i don't think you will get much from sony. times are hard, money is tight etc etc
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 10:05,
archived)

Despite denials this will turn out to be Anonymous or at least someone working under the umbrella of Anonymous ( be that 'officially or otherwise). The problem now lies with the value of the data and the scruples of the persons holding it.
This was a protest attack on Sony but there now exists an immensely valuable commodity and it may be beyond the ability of those holding it to keep the cat in the bag.
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:13,
archived)
This was a protest attack on Sony but there now exists an immensely valuable commodity and it may be beyond the ability of those holding it to keep the cat in the bag.

Anonymous say they didn't do it, they're not the only hacker group on the net.
It wasn't a protest attack it was an LOIC attack to install a modified "Rebug" onto the dev console, they had no other choice than to shut the whole thing down.
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:18,
archived)
It wasn't a protest attack it was an LOIC attack to install a modified "Rebug" onto the dev console, they had no other choice than to shut the whole thing down.

This looks to be the work of someone with a bit of talent and not just a group of kids with DDos software
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:30,
archived)

I had an interesting conversation with Barclays this morning about card safety - the guy I spoke to said that "if the card details had indeed been swiped, that would be 7 million cards (or whatever the number of users it was) which was a huge amount, there was no way they could use all of those cards to make transactions etc, so it would be unlikely you would see any fraudulent activity..."
I couldn't decide whether he was being very naive, or actually had a good point
(Hello Pasa! Long time no see!)
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:23,
archived)
I couldn't decide whether he was being very naive, or actually had a good point
(Hello Pasa! Long time no see!)

how are you doing?
( ,
Wed 27 Apr 2011, 9:50,
archived)