NEW IMAGE CHALLENGE - WILFULLY MISINTERPRETED ACRONYMS
This week's challenge is to wilfully misinterpret acronyms: make your mark on the English language by making up new meanings for old ones, or come up with new, fiendishly clever examples. The world will thank you.
( ,
Thu 1 Dec 2011, 0:12,
archived)
This week's challenge is to wilfully misinterpret acronyms: make your mark on the English language by making up new meanings for old ones, or come up with new, fiendishly clever examples. The world will thank you.
Blimey, that sounds like brainwork
I may pass on this weeks challenge, as per normal
( ,
Thu 1 Dec 2011, 0:13,
archived)
That even seems to advanced to me
but I have just indulged in one or two sambuca slammers
( ,
Thu 1 Dec 2011, 0:23,
archived)
Yay a week of Toap - My Sexy Olympics suggestion (note sexy not sex olympics) was ruined by your suggestion of SWF only
*flounces*
( ,
Thu 1 Dec 2011, 0:14,
archived)
Woo!
I wonder when we're getting a new batch of donation icons anyway.
( ,
Thu 1 Dec 2011, 0:27,
archived)
I think you should be able to pay to have whatever you like, but you have to pay if you want to change it.
It would SHIT money. Like a sneezing atm or something. Oh that reminds me.
( ,
Thu 1 Dec 2011, 0:31,
archived)
In terms of getting people to donate, that's not a bad idea.
Saying that, I never really see people change their icons that often.
Also, it looks like it has a little face on the screen like this; '.'
( ,
Thu 1 Dec 2011, 0:33,
archived)
Also, it looks like it has a little face on the screen like this; '.'
I'd make people pay for everything if I ran this site.
Like a comma upgrade where you need to pay a pound to access commas. Or donate money to change a persons signature and if they want it changed back they have to pay. Like something awful, basically.
( ,
Thu 1 Dec 2011, 0:37,
archived)
So did I :( I had a brilliant idea for it too!
It was Spiderman with cock-hands, shooting 'web'.
( ,
Thu 1 Dec 2011, 0:58,
archived)