as it was me who initially commented, please allow me to explain....(I may edit this response a few times)
You posted 2 similar images in a short space of time. There is nothing actually wrong with this.
Both images were of little artistic merit, being just TOAP. Again, not a real problem, however it would have been better to post them in the same thread or as replies to other peoples posts (with a polite threadjack statement)
My comment was something along the lines of 'I see a theme developing here'. The theme being supermarket acronyms. The fact they were similar in content is incidental. The theme I was referring to was TOAP in a main post.
All of this is of course bollocks as this is an internet messageboard for bored puerile sorts and not the UN Convention on Human Rights. The fact that you started throwing your toys out of the pram instead of playing along is where this really went wrong.
I think you are enjoying the attention with this, your most recent main post, whilst as it does contain an image, the image it contains is a)TOAPY b)a repost, and c)mine. However I'm happy to let this go for now as long as you stop being silly about things.
EDIT: Tits or GTFO
(You posted 2 similar images in a short space of time. There is nothing actually wrong with this.
Both images were of little artistic merit, being just TOAP. Again, not a real problem, however it would have been better to post them in the same thread or as replies to other peoples posts (with a polite threadjack statement)
My comment was something along the lines of 'I see a theme developing here'. The theme being supermarket acronyms. The fact they were similar in content is incidental. The theme I was referring to was TOAP in a main post.
All of this is of course bollocks as this is an internet messageboard for bored puerile sorts and not the UN Convention on Human Rights. The fact that you started throwing your toys out of the pram instead of playing along is where this really went wrong.
I think you are enjoying the attention with this, your most recent main post, whilst as it does contain an image, the image it contains is a)TOAPY b)a repost, and c)mine. However I'm happy to let this go for now as long as you stop being silly about things.
EDIT: Tits or GTFO
Griffin Saver Something, something, 2006, something.,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 20:57,
archived)
In other wordsTITS or GTFO
Good job Scaryduck is here to sort shit out
(Good job Scaryduck is here to sort shit out
Michael Ellis contributes nothing,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:00,
archived)
They normally have feathers, not hair
(
Photoshop Bitch 2014 edition,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:15,
archived)
Oh you see, you misunderstand. We're talking about breasts, boobs, chesticles, mammaries, udders, etc. Not tits as in the type of bird.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:18,
archived)
CHRISTMAS IS RUINEDagain
mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:14,
archived)
I like how he hasn't replied to a single one of us.
(
Mu Dinofiddler,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:15,
archived)
I am. My dinner is readysee you spastics!
( Griffin Saver Something, something, 2006, something.,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:17,
archived)
That's because attention can't be shared. mediocre ha ha ha, you're reading this,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:26,
archived)
This is probably the parting shot of his flounce
(
Photoshop Bitch 2014 edition,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 21:40,
archived)
oh right"it would have been better to post them in the same thread "
so perhaps it would have been polite to point this out as opposed to pissing all over someone else's work.
However they were two separate competition entries so it seems I may have in fact been entirely in the right.
(,
Tue 6 Dec 2011, 23:31,
archived)
so perhaps it would have been polite to point this out as opposed to pissing all over someone else's work.
However they were two separate competition entries so it seems I may have in fact been entirely in the right.