
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 13:17,
archived)

There's a real division here, the zero tolerance crowd vs the Spongebob CDC crowd :(
From dA she rises, creating armies on either shore, turning b3tan against his brother, until /board exists no more
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 13:42,
archived)
From dA she rises, creating armies on either shore, turning b3tan against his brother, until /board exists no more

and dd's scribbled bart simpson. one can get you sacked even seen from a distance of 15 metres and is pretty disturbing in all ways, and the other looks like a scribble until you're really quite close and is obviously drawn with different intent
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 13:44,
archived)

I got a bit of the opinion that people were making a fuss because it was moggy posting something weird, and making an easy accusation. Frankly JJ posts yiff just as strange every week and no-one bats an eyelid.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 13:52,
archived)

Well, than Sequential Art, anyway. Some of the other stuff... yeah.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 13:54,
archived)

Mountains out of fucking molehills
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 13:56,
archived)

and JJ links most of his yiffier stuff too.
UNLIKE BOURBON FOX. Kill the yiffer!
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 13:57,
archived)
UNLIKE BOURBON FOX. Kill the yiffer!

people leapt at the chance to attack her on Saturday, it was quite disturbing.
And no one stopped to check that she was saying what she meant, because she's always been so fortunate to have accurate translation tools.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:00,
archived)
And no one stopped to check that she was saying what she meant, because she's always been so fortunate to have accurate translation tools.

i do have her on ignore, and ad-blocked, i took her off ignore when she vanished and now she's back on it
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:03,
archived)

( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:03,
archived)

the crazed scribble is far more disturbing than someone with a lot of artistic talent drawing something that is acceptable in their culture but not ours.
Moggys never posted anything on here herself as far as I remember, the same can't be said for a lot of b3ta users, mongychops's Dora the Explorer will forever give me the fear
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 13:57,
archived)
Moggys never posted anything on here herself as far as I remember, the same can't be said for a lot of b3ta users, mongychops's Dora the Explorer will forever give me the fear

It doesn't look pornographic though, til you get close.
(In any event I tend to take the view B3ta is entirely not work-safe, and am glad my screen points away from everyone else so they can't see what's on it :) )
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:02,
archived)
(In any event I tend to take the view B3ta is entirely not work-safe, and am glad my screen points away from everyone else so they can't see what's on it :) )

( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:02,
archived)

That's fine, to be honest as much as I give young Foxworth a hard time, I don't really give a shit. And moggy is utter batshit mental. I just dislike it when people get themselve all riled up over fuck all, which is what seemed to happen this time.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:01,
archived)

i always have a go at him about this, i think he takes it in the way it's intended
anyway, my opinion means jack, i barely even contribute *any* pictures to b3ta anymore
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:04,
archived)
anyway, my opinion means jack, i barely even contribute *any* pictures to b3ta anymore

when it's such a conflict of cultures.
Has she perhaps been banned from all Japanese forums?
Or is she actually still obsessed with JJ?
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:15,
archived)
Has she perhaps been banned from all Japanese forums?
Or is she actually still obsessed with JJ?

On this forum she stands out a mile and courts controversy
She clearly adores the attention
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:23,
archived)
She clearly adores the attention

And gets attention, but probably not what she intended. The mob is fueling her fire. They can't wait for the next chance to jump on her. Regardless of what she posts, they will start in again, pointing fingers, and making false accusations. Any misquote is taken out of context and used against her. Just like on Saturday. Fucking cowards.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:23,
archived)

*and/or whipping, clubbing, crushing, destroying.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:30,
archived)

But moggy has consistently posted borderline content in an unlinked form, dare I mention cameltoe child waitresses, naked boy with a turd for a cock, etc. The only reason I can think that a ban resulted from this one post over any other was the statement about fictional child porn being okay.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:07,
archived)

in the affair, so I'm probably the bad guy. However, I did not contact any Mods or call for a ban. In my opinion, it was child porn and I wanted him to stop hosting it on B3ta. Moggy has in the past drawn horrific child anal rape scenes and although he never posted them here, any move in that direction and I was going to speak out. I apologise if I played a part in spoiling the always entertaining Moggy threads, but sometimes there is a line, even on B3ta.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:28,
archived)

( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:32,
archived)

Like I say, I didn't call for a ban. I'm not very up on child porn, but my perception was that it was, and therefore said so. Yes, I was predujiced because I know this person draws worse child porn for their entertainment, I admit that. But that is who I am and I'm not going to change anytime soon.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:41,
archived)

as this image testifies (very NSFW but note not linked or complained about, and was part of a series)
www.b3ta.com/board/6954415
So the question is has b3ta got to tone itself down because what people consider acceptable has changed, is the incredibly debatable and difficult definition of humour the key, or was it just internet bullying.
It'll never get solved, not on here anyway.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:36,
archived)
www.b3ta.com/board/6954415
So the question is has b3ta got to tone itself down because what people consider acceptable has changed, is the incredibly debatable and difficult definition of humour the key, or was it just internet bullying.
It'll never get solved, not on here anyway.

and therefore know I did not run to the teacher. I just said what I thought, which is what we do here, I believe. Then everyone makes up thier minds, for better or worse.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:45,
archived)

I'm just joining in with the conversation here
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:47,
archived)

And I suppose it all comes down to perception of art. I try to draw pin-up style art; a lot of women find that offensive; many don't, and most don't care either way. I, personally, found some of Moggy's art disturbing. And I said so out loud; perhaps I shouldn't have.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 14:56,
archived)

he posted it. I expect there is a place for that kind of thing on the 'net, but experience would surely have told him it wasn't here.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 15:10,
archived)

and there is clearly a massive fanbase for that judging by the picture JJ has just this second posted
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 15:17,
archived)

Moggy is not a she. Not in a million years. Women just don't draw that way, even in Japan. His pictures were always about power, control, and innocence, usually corrupted.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 15:38,
archived)

There, I said it.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 19:32,
archived)

Anyone who starts conversations about sexual content with a lie about their own gender screams ALARM to me. But perhaps just me.
If I had a 15 year old daughter who was talking to a 40-year-old man pretending to be a 15 year old girl about sexual subjects, I'd rip his face off and ask questions later.
Maybe you wouldn't, although I seem to remember you getting pretty wound up on the way people talked to your daughter.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 22:14,
archived)
If I had a 15 year old daughter who was talking to a 40-year-old man pretending to be a 15 year old girl about sexual subjects, I'd rip his face off and ask questions later.
Maybe you wouldn't, although I seem to remember you getting pretty wound up on the way people talked to your daughter.

However the subject matter often left a lot to be desired. But then is acceptability much like humour: entirely subjective? There was an excellent point made the other day about the normalisation of illegal fantasies, the more cartoon paedophilia that floats about on the net the less impact it has and therefore the more accepted it may become. But does this mean that all dA users want to go out and fuck wild animals? I would hope that most healthy, sane individuals can distinguish between images made for their own titilation and going outside to do the real thing.
None of ^this means I encourage the creation of fictional child porn images, I'm just saying what has been said over and over the last couple of days - the issue is a very tricky one. Either we stamp all over everything that could cause offense (including mongychops' kids tv stuff), or tread carefully and judge each case in isolation, the latter of which is always going to cause upset when different people's standards vary.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 15:14,
archived)
None of ^this means I encourage the creation of fictional child porn images, I'm just saying what has been said over and over the last couple of days - the issue is a very tricky one. Either we stamp all over everything that could cause offense (including mongychops' kids tv stuff), or tread carefully and judge each case in isolation, the latter of which is always going to cause upset when different people's standards vary.

I believe there are studies that link porn and sex-crime, but it appears it is entirely down to individuals, not the content.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 15:25,
archived)

See also - a few mentally ill kids playing violent computer games or watching action films, then going out to hurt or kill people resulting in a ban or age restrictions for everyone else.
( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 15:29,
archived)

( ,
Mon 15 Oct 2012, 20:01,
archived)
