Once again i open up my copy of zoo weekly and turn to the jpeg secton. What do i see?. More lazy arse b3tans stealing others work and sending it in for zoo to publish. Now i for one wouldn't mind having my work published in zoo (if it was any good) but for others to send it without asking is out of order. So hear my message, content stealers, if u wish to send off our work EMAIL US, IT AINT HARD.
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 17:35,
archived)
*wipes a tear away, knowing none of his work will ever be poached*
You make a good point.
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 17:37,
archived)
You make a good point.
Any image that appears on the front page and many off the board get e-mailed around to people's friends often without mentioning a particular poster's name.
Any Kudos from getting an image published in a magazine remains with the creator whether they ever realise it or not.
Think of it as getting a different kind of front page.
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 17:41,
archived)
Any Kudos from getting an image published in a magazine remains with the creator whether they ever realise it or not.
Think of it as getting a different kind of front page.
i aint got a scan but one was the wayne roony/shrek one and the other was the cornish pasty sunrise
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 17:44,
archived)
that the image gets printed is only a compliment to the creator. Most of the source images people use are taken from other sites to begin with so 'stealing' is not really something we can take the moral highground over unless someone was trying to use it for profit.
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 17:48,
archived)
you can copy someone else's concept and then refine or improve it, so long as it has been shown to have employed 'an inventive step'. For example, a watch with a USB flash drive in it. The inventor of the watch can't sue, and neither can the inventor of the USB flash drive.
Doing things to images to change their meaning for entertainment purposes is an inventive step. Taking a picture of a monkey needs a steady hand, equipment and an eye for a good picture. Turning the monkey picture into a pic of Yasser Arafat is skill. Pimping off someone else's skills is wrong.
I rest my case, m'lud
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 18:04,
archived)
Doing things to images to change their meaning for entertainment purposes is an inventive step. Taking a picture of a monkey needs a steady hand, equipment and an eye for a good picture. Turning the monkey picture into a pic of Yasser Arafat is skill. Pimping off someone else's skills is wrong.
I rest my case, m'lud
to the b3ta board with my e-mail but it is precisely because I'm concerned about having stuff nicked that I do it... I have had gags from my website stolen for two different TV shows that I know of, so I appreciate what you're saying brother.
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 17:49,
archived)
(well not quite but it was rather coincidental)
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 17:53,
archived)
that cornish pasty flood defence one was mine.
the cunts.
is it in this weeks edition? i might have to go and get it.
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 17:50,
archived)
the cunts.
is it in this weeks edition? i might have to go and get it.
it was a throwaway piece, but would be nice to see in print.
(,
Thu 16 Sep 2004, 17:53,
archived)