fuckin gayer harold!
*swings foot*
p.s. woo to the pic! scary as fuck! eugh, gays *shudders*
( ,
Sat 20 Nov 2004, 12:15,
archived)
p.s. woo to the pic! scary as fuck! eugh, gays *shudders*
it's genetically wrong
except for gay women... thats frickin sweet!
( ,
Sat 20 Nov 2004, 12:21,
archived)
yey!
can you resurrect him afterwards so that I can beat him to death too?
( ,
Sat 20 Nov 2004, 12:24,
archived)
Marvellous!
anyone else want a turn with this retarded, double-standards bigot when I'm through?
( ,
Sat 20 Nov 2004, 12:30,
archived)
hahaha
jesus man only joking.
my catholic irish housemate says "they should all burn in the fires of hell!"
lol
( ,
Sat 20 Nov 2004, 12:40,
archived)
my catholic irish housemate says "they should all burn in the fires of hell!"
lol
I may not be Jesus
But I do have a large pointy metal stick. Some call it a knife.
*pokes*
( ,
Sat 20 Nov 2004, 12:47,
archived)
*pokes*
well...
as long as you like it in the privacy of your own home, then i don't think anyone will mind
( ,
Sat 20 Nov 2004, 12:49,
archived)
maybe it is
although, he'd not be too pleased that he's missing out on this...
( ,
Sat 20 Nov 2004, 12:33,
archived)
Point of information:
There's rather a lot of research suggesting that homosexuality can actually benefit the transmission of genes in several species of animals. I don't have the references to hand, but the argument goes like this: where a male is unable, for whatever reason, to pass on his own genes, by removing himself from the direct competition by being gay, and providing support to his siblings rather than wasting energy fighting over mates, copies of his genes are passed on (via brothers and sisters) where they othewise may not have been. So genetically being gay isn't necessarily wrong.
***This doesn't necessarily apply to humans, before I get flamed for calling gay men weak.***
( ,
Sat 20 Nov 2004, 12:50,
archived)
***This doesn't necessarily apply to humans, before I get flamed for calling gay men weak.***