b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 6563649 (Thread)

# Topical
(I helped save b3ta! Random Image Yes, yes, I'll speak to you on Monday, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:27, archived)
# What utter tosh.
You've genuinely riled me with your small minded bigotry.

Haddaway and die you fuck.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:29, archived)
# whilst I kind of agree with this ^^
I say forced cold turkey all round.
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:31, archived)
# Really? Why?
I just went against my libertarian instincts and voted in favour of taxes paying for smack on the BBC poll.
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:37, archived)
# Linky.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:38, archived)
# The poll is on the story
which is on the news front page, at the top, on the right.
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:43, archived)
# trying to provoke
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:50, archived)
# Give em as much as it take to kill themselves I say.
Keeps them out our houses and mugging our grannies.
(I helped save b3ta! riverghost servicing your mum since, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:30, archived)
# ^this
I'm with you.

But first, give me back my fucking camera and DVD player you fucking cunts.
(I helped save b3ta! finnbar has officially retired, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:37, archived)
# terrorist trade union?
al-qaida?

NEWS JUST IN...


no serious offence intended sir
(I helped save b3ta! fuckyouTtssattsr you cunt, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:30, archived)
# Did you know that cunt spelt backwards is spelt
sparrow.
(I helped save b3ta! riverghost servicing your mum since, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:33, archived)
# *smelt
(I helped save b3ta! TechImp is trying to be nice (with great difficulty)., Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:58, archived)
# Fuck on Tuesday
Cock your face, Tory Boy.
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:34, archived)
# Well, quite!
He may be perfectly accurate in his statement, but we can't let something like that be an excuse for people to broach unpopular and non media-friendly ideas...
(PsychoApeMan Riding a white pig to the edge of Lapland, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:32, archived)
# Hell no
Free discussion of ideas is unchristian and, well, frankly... wrong.
(I helped save b3ta! Button Man ...a right bottom feeder., Wed 22 Nov 2006, 21:13, archived)
# Fuck on Tuesday
Cock your face, Tory Boy.
(A small damp ball of cotton, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:33, archived)
# what a marvellous reply!
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:33, archived)
# Hey!
I'm Tory as you like, but I still believe that the legalisation of drugs would be of huge benefit to our nation, cut right down on organised crime and prostitution, lower the number of addicts who commit constant opportunistic crimes, reduce the risk of infection and generally make the country a much better place to live.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:37, archived)
# Fuck on Tuesday
Cock your face, Tory Boy
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:38, archived)
# Gonna get a banning.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:38, archived)
# oooooh
that would be interesting.
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:41, archived)
# Nah
you have to be a real fucking idiot ALL THE FUCKING TIME for that to happen.
(I helped save b3ta! mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:43, archived)
# HE'S ON FUCKING FIRE!
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:47, archived)
# heh heh
(I helped save b3ta! mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 21:00, archived)
# That's a neato what now right!
(Pigpen was 'ere on, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 21:05, archived)
# That's all very well, but rape, burglary, etc. involve victims.
The crime of taking drugs, almost uniquely, doesn't. Actually, it's not even a crime, if you can manage to take them without possessing them.
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:34, archived)
# unless you count yourself as a victim of your own actions
incidentally, if one is snorting cocaine through a straw, without touching it.... does that count as possession?
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:36, archived)
# Financing an addiction can do
is what that police bloke was on about
(I helped save b3ta! Jahled Three shades of black, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:37, archived)
# pardon?
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:38, archived)
# Smack addicts cost £48000 a year in crime each*
or £12k if we supplied it to them

*Channel Four news
(I helped save b3ta! Jahled Three shades of black, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:41, archived)
# re-read your sentence
:)
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:43, archived)
# Reads fine here
Financing their own addiction = other people being victims of thier resulting crimes!

(I helped save b3ta! Jahled Three shades of black, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:49, archived)
# £12k
if we supply them, while we can cure them of their addiction and after that they wouldn't cost us anything?!
(I helped save b3ta! Random Image Yes, yes, I'll speak to you on Monday, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:45, archived)
# But this "curing" involves a process of weaning-off.
The weaning-off would be best achieved with heroin.
It also requires the drug user to actually want to be weaned off it. Those who don't want to will continue buying heroin, and since it's illegal, they will have to pay the high prices necessary to persuade certain enterprising inviduals to smuggle it into the country stuffed inside dogs and suchlike. I am in favour of the taxpayer paying for it instead, since it would then be semi-legal and much cheaper, due to obviating the need for any smuggling rigmarole.
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 21:04, archived)
# Even better, make it legal, but nobody's given me a poll to vote for that.
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 21:06, archived)
# Yes,
but financing an illegal addiction is very different to financing a legal one.

Crime would drop if there wasn't the need to buy from dodgy folks who take advantage.
(I helped save b3ta! LordManley twitter.com/LordManley, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:41, archived)
# I love your liberal world view :D
(I helped save b3ta! mr horrible up yours, dickface, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:48, archived)
# Whilst,
I didn't expect this sort of debate to rage here (which isn't a bad thing) i don't have a problem with addicts being TREATED to get over thier addiction, what i have a problem with is that many will take advantage of this fact, that they can continue, while as tax payer we will foot the bill.
(I helped save b3ta! Random Image Yes, yes, I'll speak to you on Monday, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:42, archived)
# Currently they are treated with methodone, which is more addictive, and no fun.
Up until the 70s heroin was available on prescription, which undercut the market for illegal heroin.
(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 20:58, archived)
# I did not know that
I knew they used some kind of substitute, which i am in favour of. But getting free junk on the NHS seems to be a waste of finances which could be better spent elsewhere!?
(I helped save b3ta! Random Image Yes, yes, I'll speak to you on Monday, Wed 22 Nov 2006, 21:16, archived)