b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 6962839 (Thread)

#
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 21:55, archived)
# I fourt it woz Ricci
Job's a gud'un
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 21:56, archived)
# it is ricci
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 21:57, archived)
# Yer, I werz juz confurmin' see
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 21:58, archived)
# probably still would
and woo :-)
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 21:57, archived)
# ^ this =)
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:01, archived)
# Would!
Nicely done.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 21:59, archived)
# THIS BURLUDDY WEBSITE
I read your username as something else you were King of.....
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:08, archived)
# Breasts...
hehehe, happens lots :D
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:13, archived)
# Needs moar pr0n
We're allowed to post papnorks, arsecakes and vaginaflanges now.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 21:59, archived)
# No we are not.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:01, archived)
# We're not?
Odd. Seems that way lately.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:06, archived)
# no we aren't
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:02, archived)
# let it go
his panties are all bunched up
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:04, archived)
# I'm just confused.
I've been edited for posting pictures of fully clothed girls at 10pm on a Saturday night. Lately there's been a rash of nudity on the board that has gone completely ignored. It's weird.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:09, archived)
# it all depends if there's a mod about
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:11, archived)
# Not just mods. Everyone...
My exorcist Read The Faq pic got the beatdown even though there's no nudity or anything overtly obscene. Countless times have fully clothed LNAs been shouted down as NSFW because of something dumb like "their hand is in a suggestive place."

I'm just wondering if the tolerances have changed? I've got a backlog of more risque work that I never posted 'cause I know it would probably get shouted down as NSFW. I'm not sure if I should perhaps post one or two.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:15, archived)
# indded it does
and it depends if it looks like you are looking at porn, which a 10px by 10px shot of tits in a cartoon picture doesn't
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:15, archived)
# Twice in the last week
my daugher has looked over my shoulder as I was looking at B3ta, seen a pic from across the room and yelled "Ewww! Mom! Mark's looking at porn."

That says it all, really.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:20, archived)
# Yup
I got naughty stepped for 10 days for posting a picture of a fully clothed woman holding a board bearing the legend (o)(o)

It wasn't even sexy looking.

I guess it depends whether the right person likes the image.

On boards I admin I generally have as much trouble controlling stupid ovezealous mods as I do with actual modding.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:16, archived)
# And right now we have some guy who's posting an animation
that clearly shows a guy fucking a girl then throwing her into a pool.

( i106.photobucket.com/albums/m269/TomHazelgrove/WooYaaaaypool.gif )

I don't care about the actual content. I'm just wondering if the rules have changed or something.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:23, archived)
# I agree.
You ill note that I replied in negative fashion?

www.b3ta.com/board/6962815
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:27, archived)
# yes we aren't.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:03, archived)
# No you aren't
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:04, archived)
#
she's done a lot of growing up
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:00, archived)
# She looks like me now.
Clearly Micto is in love with me.
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:05, archived)
# clearly
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:12, archived)
# good work
i never know who these people are
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:05, archived)
# 'ning micto
\m/
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:07, archived)
# aiiiiiiight
(, Sun 11 Mar 2007, 22:14, archived)