b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 6963784 (Thread)

# my first go at one of these
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:11, archived)
# I'm sorry... i cant see it...
my eyes are streaming after reading your name...
pfft
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:15, archived)
# It's always been the best distraction from my poor work
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:25, archived)
# needs more aerial photo
these really don't work unless it's an aerial photo
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:17, archived)
# I haven't uploaded it yet
but I did a reasonable one taken from a bridge looking down a long road.
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:33, archived)
# cool
you uploaded your bash photos yet?
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:34, archived)
# Haven't even got them off my camera yet.
I'm so slack/been too busy playing Worms.
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:50, archived)
# didn't you used to be 'you drive like a mong in a dodgem'
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:18, archived)
#
yep thats me I'm slowly shortening the name to mongem
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:21, archived)
# haha
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:23, archived)
# Its a bit blurry and a bit in focus
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:19, archived)
# ace
That's what i was aiming for, I rawk!
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:22, archived)
# sorry, but....

:D
i think you should shorten your name to Mongem, i like it
www.b3ta.com/board/6963806

'ning alls!
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:26, archived)
# 'ning tets
and yes, he is indeed the warrior king!
Is he making more films soon?
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:27, archived)
# i hope so, because he is
theTiTs TM
official

(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:31, archived)
# I thought it was great in the Warrior king where he ran into Jackie Chan
I have love for the Chan man too
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:32, archived)
# Police Story
best Chan flick EVAH!!
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:44, archived)
# yay for backend equipment
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:33, archived)
# What the shuddering fuck?!
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:34, archived)
# science
^_^
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:43, archived)
# Heya ivvv
*waves*
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:25, archived)
# 'lo Weasel
*ruffles hair*
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:26, archived)
# *licks paws*
*pats down tufts*
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:27, archived)
# I think it needs to be taken from on high
It just looks a bit out of focus
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:19, archived)
# well......
A) That effect only really works on ariel photography
B) I don't see the point of that particular effect, could someone please explain the appeal?
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:19, archived)
# when it's done on an aerial photo
it tricks the eye into thinking you're looking at a scale model

which is intriguing for the first few times, then after, a little bit 'meh'
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:21, archived)
# I guess its one of those things that should be included in a photoshop tutorial booklet
'ning micto
Had a good weekend?
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:23, archived)
# very good
it's been the first weekend in a while that i feel refreshed and relaxed on a monday morning

you?
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:32, archived)
# Really? Whats your secret?
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:34, archived)
# no idea
i washed the cars, mowed the lawn
made icecream and played with the kid in the garden
oh, and got lots of sleep and played my uke
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:39, archived)
# sounds awfully productive
And how did you got about making icecream?
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:41, archived)
# Yeah I feel pretty good too.
Regular sleeping hours and a good cup of coffee go a long way
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:37, archived)
# I yam in ur bord sig
proovin ur maths
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:22, archived)
# When done properly,
the scene no longer looks life-sized. The artform is intended to make the viewers believe they are looking at a tabletop model.
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:25, archived)
# yes
but

why?

you could darken a photograph to make it look like it was taken at night but what would be the point?
taking photos of models or at night are things that can be done in reality, why bother usinig photoshop for the same effect?
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:28, archived)
# I've seen a few of these lately.
A lot of people are getting the effect wrong.

The idea is to emulate the depth of field you'd get from a camera with a macro lens & wide aperture. This means that only a certain plane of the photo will be in focus, and that is a plane a certain distance from the camera.
Therefore it doesn't work if, as people have been doing, you blur random parts of the image, or change the focus on the vertical plane.

Silly people.
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:28, archived)
# pffft
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:29, archived)
# I have no idea what the above means so I'll "This^" it to look smart
'ning wheely! Had a good weekend?
How much rampage will £3.26 get me?
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:30, archived)
# For £3.26
I will knock over a broom.

My weekend was okay. A bit dull really.

I am sad today though, as I need to stark looking for work. :(
(, Mon 12 Mar 2007, 9:33, archived)