![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/6250184.stm
possibly glasscock but OH MY GOD PLEASE NO don't legitimise the rape of a beautiful language.
The day that the official spelling becomes 'butiful' will be a sad day indeed.
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 17:20,
archived)
possibly glasscock but OH MY GOD PLEASE NO don't legitimise the rape of a beautiful language.
The day that the official spelling becomes 'butiful' will be a sad day indeed.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
if they are taught to fucking spell and read and write
FOR THE CHILDREN FOR THE CHILDREN!!!
What complete crap.
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 17:31,
archived)
FOR THE CHILDREN FOR THE CHILDREN!!!
What complete crap.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
This makes me angry on many different levels!
Not least because they are slaughtering a decent language to bring the bar closer to the chavish prole!
(sorry if you're a chavish prole)
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 17:43,
archived)
Not least because they are slaughtering a decent language to bring the bar closer to the chavish prole!
(sorry if you're a chavish prole)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
the country can not run itself, we need a b3tan uprissing!
Who's with me!
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 18:03,
archived)
Who's with me!
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i can't spell for shit, but thats what spell-check and the dictionary were invented for.
These people are just bored sociologists with nothing better to ruin.
*edit* and incredible tolerance for idiocy
**edit edit** ROFL just noticed that the sociologist is blaming 'spelling' for the rise in single parent numbers....
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 17:52,
archived)
These people are just bored sociologists with nothing better to ruin.
*edit* and incredible tolerance for idiocy
**edit edit** ROFL just noticed that the sociologist is blaming 'spelling' for the rise in single parent numbers....
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Fuck the children (not literally), I only care about my own ability to read. If they're too thick to learn to read, that's their fault.
And "moast"? That's making it harder to spell.
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 18:02,
archived)
And "moast"? That's making it harder to spell.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
The phonetic alphabet would have to change as well, we'd actually end up with MORE letters to make a "u" either a "oo" or a "ew" or a "eau" or whatver sound. We'd end up with more accents on vowels. If anything it would just make things more complicated.
Sounds to me like a dyslexic person got bullied at school for being unable to spell and is now trying to make the whole world like her. While we're at it let's force feed Big Macs to skinny people.
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 18:02,
archived)
Sounds to me like a dyslexic person got bullied at school for being unable to spell and is now trying to make the whole world like her. While we're at it let's force feed Big Macs to skinny people.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and there are many very sound but rather dull linguistical type reasons why it is a load of cock and won't work
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 18:10,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
is that it's a load of cock and won't work
:D
( ,
Tue 10 Jul 2007, 18:19,
archived)
:D