
i used to have a straight-boy crush on him as a teenager
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:27,
archived)

you're gay for him, admit it.
you want him to touch your bum like a cheeky girl.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:30,
archived)
you want him to touch your bum like a cheeky girl.

or as cool as him
or that i wanted him to touch my bum
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:32,
archived)
or that i wanted him to touch my bum

it's ok for straights to go for...
probably
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:36,
archived)
probably

you ain't never gonna amount to nothing.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:33,
archived)

I'm having issues with clients who are using artwork I've designed for my mag in competitors mags too. It's really annoying, as I spend my time coming up with new creative for them, only for them to go and bloody use it elsewhere.
I was wondering if anyone knew the legal standpoint on this, who holds the copyright etc.
I'm thinking of starting to watermark the proofs.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:27,
archived)
I was wondering if anyone knew the legal standpoint on this, who holds the copyright etc.
I'm thinking of starting to watermark the proofs.

If not and you own full copyright, threaten them with legal action unless they pay you.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:29,
archived)

so maybe you should use some tact rather than threatening legal action straight off the bat.
Perhaps "I'd rather you didn't put these in competitor's magazines" will work.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:31,
archived)
Perhaps "I'd rather you didn't put these in competitor's magazines" will work.

i assume you retain copyright, so you've licensed the use of your image for a specific purpose?
or if you've relinquished copyright, that you get royalties for each use?
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:30,
archived)
or if you've relinquished copyright, that you get royalties for each use?

There's nothing in the contract about the artwork we do for clients, it's just a bit of added value. If a client is running an advert in a competitors mag, we'll always redesign it (because they can't design for toffee).
I've had a thought... if we use images that we hold the licence for, surely I can use that as an excuse to stop them, a bit of a scare they might get fined.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:48,
archived)
I've had a thought... if we use images that we hold the licence for, surely I can use that as an excuse to stop them, a bit of a scare they might get fined.

"added value"
when you do people favours, they take liberties, ie: fuck you over
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 12:19,
archived)
when you do people favours, they take liberties, ie: fuck you over

But that looks to be for images and photographs, as opposed to newly designed creative as in this case.
That's handy though.
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 12:03,
archived)
That's handy though.

and then it's just hilarious
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:38,
archived)

( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:43,
archived)

what a tune
(and for Bungle, it's a surprisingly normal tune)
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 11:54,
archived)
(and for Bungle, it's a surprisingly normal tune)

remind me to show you my Cali'pics one day!
( ,
Mon 17 Sep 2007, 12:04,
archived)