
so wrong, but yet so good
seriously, this is ultrowoo, but needlessy large
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:36,
archived)
seriously, this is ultrowoo, but needlessy large

we will never know
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:43,
archived)

Woo! great stuff!
Edit: I really like that. try posting gif instead of png next time, works very well for drawings and keeps the filesize down :)
Edit2: Much better with the paper!
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:37,
archived)
Edit: I really like that. try posting gif instead of png next time, works very well for drawings and keeps the filesize down :)
Edit2: Much better with the paper!

files are only large because they're badly optimised by the either the software or user or both.
They actually compress better than gifs if you do it right.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics#File_size_and_optimization_software
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:52,
archived)
They actually compress better than gifs if you do it right.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portable_Network_Graphics#File_size_and_optimization_software

I knew toss all about png before. Thanks.
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:57,
archived)

blah blah blah... tried to resize it in photobucket and it made the file size bigger for some reason.
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:40,
archived)

it goes shit if i make it lossier than this
[edit: yes, the way you've done it now is the best way]

if you stand three foot back from the screen.
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:43,
archived)

brings out the colours and smoothens the hard bits :)
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:44,
archived)

Am I allowed to upload a smoother version?
The whole transparent .png idea was a bit pointless really.
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:46,
archived)
The whole transparent .png idea was a bit pointless really.

just try getting near 50k, or the locals'll get angry again :)
you should know the "FAQ!" "BIGGER!" etc rituals by now ;)
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:50,
archived)
you should know the "FAQ!" "BIGGER!" etc rituals by now ;)

*gets the feeling the mashed potato barrier for the castle wasn't that a good idea*
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:58,
archived)

It'll be much smaller and smoother, wins all round.
S'gorgeous, would be a shame to have it frowned on for the sake of a few kb
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:52,
archived)
S'gorgeous, would be a shame to have it frowned on for the sake of a few kb

and i'll make it a smaller .png
unless we're talking lossy .gifs like what i tried up there ^^
(edit: basically, what he said)
( ,
Mon 19 Nov 2007, 18:56,
archived)
unless we're talking lossy .gifs like what i tried up there ^^
(edit: basically, what he said)