b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7832809 (Thread)

#

i think I've seen this b4? but I did it anyway I was bored...
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:06, archived)
# Amy Winehouse?
Also, what is this "b4"?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:07, archived)
# maybe he's sunk your battleship
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:09, archived)
# its like
spelling that makes \/p words
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:10, archived)
# Vp?
Is that pointing to the time in your sig?
"17.10p"?
/patronising
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:11, archived)
#
/\0
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:17, archived)
# Seriously,
what?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:18, archived)
# Seriously
thats a word as well.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:22, archived)
# You're confusing.
I like that.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:23, archived)
# "it's"
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:12, archived)
# ^That too
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:13, archived)
# "...Monty Python's Flying Circus!"

(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:18, archived)
# BRRRR-BupbupbupBUPbabaaa-ba-ba-ba-ba-baabaaaaaa!
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:24, archived)
# i'm releifed that i'm not the unly wan suffering from friday brain meltdown
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:28, archived)
# aren't words always made by spelling?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:38, archived)
# Somebody was complaining earlier (at you, I think) about the running-together of "a" and "lot" to make the new word "alot".
Then Fluffy Elephants mentioned an argument with a friend who thought some other phrase was all one word. Thing is, though, english contains masses of compound words. Already in this reply I've used "somebody" and "together" and "already". Will we never have any new ones now, just because we have dictionary entries to be snotty about? Are dictionaries bad for the health of a language?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:19, archived)
# I was actually trying to type "a lot" but I didn't hit space hard enough,
whoever it was was just taking advantage of the fact that I'm younger than most on here ;)

But I don't get your point :S
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:21, archived)
# How about: the publishers of dictionaries look out for new words all the time, and include them in new editions.
These words come about by people using words that aren't in dictionaries. Whenever they do this, there are other people who tell them that they shouldn't use those words because they aren't in the dictionary. Is their disapproval right or wrong? Should we stop inventing new words for new dictionaries?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:28, archived)
# Oh, I thought you were saying that
Well, "B4" can't really BE a word, because it's half a number :S
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:29, archived)
# How about "u" for "you"?
It matches nicely with the single-letter "I". We could capitalise it, for clarity.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:33, archived)
# i'm with you
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:33, archived)
# Ugh, the French, Germans and Italians have their languages dictated to them?
Grim.
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:37, archived)
# Data's bastard cousin
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 18:10, archived)
# did you make this?
or did emptyisum.org?
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:16, archived)
#
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:28, archived)
# hahahaha.
look at their little faces...
(, Fri 30 Nov 2007, 17:18, archived)