
hahaha the daily mail are such a bunch of dicks
( ,
Sun 13 Jul 2008, 23:11,
archived)

that we should give a rat's arse?
/just wondering...
( ,
Sun 13 Jul 2008, 22:43,
archived)
/just wondering...

Perhaps the Mail has "ruined something special".
But Banksie's anonymity would not be interesting if no-one cared, and if no-one cared no-one would look.
Great scoop for the Mail, but I am sad he has been unmasked.
( ,
Sun 13 Jul 2008, 23:02,
archived)
But Banksie's anonymity would not be interesting if no-one cared, and if no-one cared no-one would look.
Great scoop for the Mail, but I am sad he has been unmasked.

i wouldnt wipe my arse with the daily mail
still if there were no artists left in the world i wouldnt ask banksy to paint either
( ,
Sun 13 Jul 2008, 22:30,
archived)
still if there were no artists left in the world i wouldnt ask banksy to paint either

is that whether its him or not and whether you like his work or not, the Daily Mail and your reactions prove he is an artist by definition. In both his daubings and his big charade.
Good on him for getting people feeling something about pictures and the like.
( ,
Sun 13 Jul 2008, 22:46,
archived)
Good on him for getting people feeling something about pictures and the like.

Can't be argued against now, given the sheer reception and praise of the guy's work by our artistic critique elite; so amazing coming from the mail which would normally point this stuff at young teenagers and have about fifty editorials about how society is disintegrating in the face of one individual actually producing stuff worthy 'as art'
( ,
Sun 13 Jul 2008, 23:16,
archived)