b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 8775061 (Thread)

# Err..
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:28, archived)
# Mindpiss
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:29, archived)
# Warning; Urine Inside
I'm not complaining, I'm just waiting for the reposts; is all.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:31, archived)
# I thought so
Fraser has Altheimer's!
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:31, archived)
# Similar, yes
But not the same. Robots are real (or at least a lot of them are), sci-fi isn't. You can shop Darth Vader in this challenge, you couldn't in the other.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:33, archived)
# I think the fine line between the original robot challenge and this one
is something only sci-fi/robot geeks will understand.
So that's 99½% of B3tards satisfied ;)
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:36, archived)
# that's me out then.
shall we do something different involving flowers and animals instead?
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:56, archived)
# I hope it's not too late to suggest
Flowers, animals, shoes and erm, more shoes.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 21:21, archived)
# and... crabs?
...or elephants?
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 21:24, archived)
# I suppose,
but through geeky pedantry, were Daleks robots or simply vessels/vehicles?

And was Darth Vader a cyborg, I mean all his limbs and as far as I know respiratory system were robotic, so surely he was more fitting to the compo then Daleks?

Same with AT-AT's they're vehicles, not robots.

I'm not trying to discredit your post/this compo, just saying the compos are pretty much open to interpretation anyway and so this one is very similar - but I shall welcome it as we couldn't have Carrie Fisher in a metal bikini in the last compo.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:39, archived)
# This is different
It's a slightly different excuse to pearoast slightly different pictures you did months ago and are hoping will be funnier this time round.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:34, archived)
# shirley 'sci fi' doesn't just mean 'robots'
:/
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:36, archived)
# How the fuck did your Olympic cyclist animation not get fp'ed?
Fucking travesty, I say.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:37, archived)
# sure it wasn't a different image?
/devils advocate blog
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:40, archived)
# I'm not sure what you mean.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:41, archived)
# check his/her profile
that didn't get a FP, something else did ;D

I apologise for being a pedant
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:43, archived)
# Eh, you're confusing me. I was asking why it DIDN'T get fp'ed.
Am I being stupid today? Just ignore me if I am.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:47, archived)
# 'spazzes back' nah it's me
'clicks ignore on self'
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 21:12, archived)
# that was placing robots in history.
this, as the spiel suggest, involves tarting up elements of sci-fi to make them more 'retro', hence steampunbking star wars, etc.

The idea behind it was to do something with the characters,ships themselves etc etc, and not just plonk robots in the past
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:39, archived)
# Which is near enough
What I've done, with my rubbish photoshop skills/lack of imagination. My Bad etc.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:41, archived)
# no no no, wasn't having a go at all :)
I was answering scarus's point that they're not really the same challenge :)
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:42, archived)
# It's OK
I was having a go at myself, really.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:43, archived)
# Any chance of a job, Fraser?
:)
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:50, archived)
# Don't worry I understood,
I was just being satirical and abit of a nob.
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:41, archived)
# welcome to b3ta :)
(, Wed 24 Sep 2008, 20:42, archived)