
you've finally incporporated the overrated pleb into something with real talent
( ,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:30,
archived)

We are going to fall out, Archie!!
;)
( ,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:32,
archived)
;)

Bowie is a talent who has changed generations with varying styles of music, and he earns respect for such talent.
Singing a few whiney songs to a reptitive guitar riff, then realising how shit they are you have to take a shotgun
to yourself does not make Cobain any sort of musical 'legend' as many would have us believe.
and as for Battenburg....
( ,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:35,
archived)
Singing a few whiney songs to a reptitive guitar riff, then realising how shit they are you have to take a shotgun
to yourself does not make Cobain any sort of musical 'legend' as many would have us believe.
and as for Battenburg....

But I ask myself the same question about The Beatles and John Lennon.
Also you are on Jonathon Ross. ; )
( ,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:41,
archived)
Also you are on Jonathon Ross. ; )

Nirvana would probably have gone downhill as most artists/groups do when their 'niche' becomes oversaturated in the market
with lots of spin-off groups, solo projects, imitators and pretenders to the throne.
Most groups do.
The Beatles, along with artists such as Bowie, Queen to name but two more, varied styles over different eras, marketing themselves out
to different groups and styles. That's what kept them 'big'
( ,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:43,
archived)
with lots of spin-off groups, solo projects, imitators and pretenders to the throne.
Most groups do.
The Beatles, along with artists such as Bowie, Queen to name but two more, varied styles over different eras, marketing themselves out
to different groups and styles. That's what kept them 'big'

but he's one of those changable artists that you can't pin down an "iconic" image for. The same with Madonna really. If somebody can suggest the ideal 'Bowie' image, then I'll give it a go. Same goes for Madonna :)
( ,
Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:51,
archived)