(Barbarossais not my real name,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 12:35,
archived)
this confuses me
but I googled it
(bilbobarneybobsI'll be 14 in b3ta years soon.,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 12:32,
archived)
GCSE English lols
I got a 'B' twenty years ago. WTF!
I think they're both wrong, because they're both relating to plurals...
(Barbarossais not my real name,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 12:34,
archived)
I thought that less was to do with the size or extent of something
and fewer was the number... that's what was beaten into me by my mother when I was younger... now when I see the "10 items or less" line in Tesco I feel like I'm about to be walloped.
(Barbarossais not my real name,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 12:40,
archived)
No, you're fine
fewer is for countable quantities, less is for uncountable ones, like an amount of water.
(_Felix's school of dance and occult sciences,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 13:40,
archived)
Thanks for the support
but you should have been here before I changed it
(Barbarossais not my real name,
Fri 12 Dec 2008, 14:48,
archived)
Arf!
The congestion charge, in London at least, whilst being a good idea in theory, was never going to work. The people who drive into the city during the hours it operates are either people who have to do it for work, like service engineers etc, or they are people that are so wealthy that paying an extra £8 a day is never going to bother them in the slightest.