
Let's just call 'em all thick like we used to.
And have workhouses.
And debtor's prisons.
And rickets.
Also: anyone else find themselves going a bit Daily Mail over this story?
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 13:59,
archived)
And have workhouses.
And debtor's prisons.
And rickets.
Also: anyone else find themselves going a bit Daily Mail over this story?

I was just firing up photoshop to scramble up the report, but now I see what you've done. pfft.
Also, I can confirm that a little knowledge is dangerous and that he's a fucking wanker.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:00,
archived)
Also, I can confirm that a little knowledge is dangerous and that he's a fucking wanker.

And the last thing you want is science and medicine to get involved in things like what dyslexia are, they just over-complicate it.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:00,
archived)

Hence the smoking ban. Ignore the science, people smoking in public places pisses some people off, so let's fucking ban it and pretend it's for medical reasons.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:02,
archived)


because in my country there are indoor smoking areas, as this country, ironically, is much less fascist than your little island.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:04,
archived)

*considers this a vote well cast*
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:25,
archived)

And what this shit with putting mr beard and his fucking tumor or my cigs? Either give an actual shit about our health and ban em totally so I can get them cheaper of dealers or just let us get on with it
*huf huf*
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:05,
archived)
*huf huf*

'Oooh, I've got lungs, what have you got?'
'foetus.'
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:06,
archived)
'foetus.'

Or maybe just finding the most grotesque pictures and putting them where children will see
maybe we should have a smokers warning label image challenge, or bindun? Can't remember any in my time on b3ta...
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:12,
archived)
maybe we should have a smokers warning label image challenge, or bindun? Can't remember any in my time on b3ta...

*loves smoking*
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:14,
archived)

but, I still don't think that there is enough objective evidence that passive smoking is dangerous enough to afford a ban on all smoking in all public areas, especially since there is a WHO study showing that there is no significant difference between the likelihood of contracting lung cancer for someone who doesn't work in a smokey environment compared with someone who does. It is however, a study that is completely ignored by legislators.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:18,
archived)

Not yet anyway, I enjoy it too much.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:19,
archived)

but I smoke waaaay too much, so I'm going to try quitting... seems like a good idea just now.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:21,
archived)

I smoke more than you do, and you never bitch at me for it. If you quit then I'm not being sorry for smoking around you, you'll just have to deal with it.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:22,
archived)

Since about this time last year i've been on 1.5-2 packs a day. Beat that.
(I shall only be giving up smoking of the cigarettes, which may or may not lead to being considerably more stoned more often)
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:25,
archived)
(I shall only be giving up smoking of the cigarettes, which may or may not lead to being considerably more stoned more often)

God knows how much baccy goes into one of those spliffs.
I didn't realise you'd gone up to that though. Alright, give up, then come home and get stoned with your good old pal Captain.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:30,
archived)
I didn't realise you'd gone up to that though. Alright, give up, then come home and get stoned with your good old pal Captain.

(I swell alarmingly during bouts of it)
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:01,
archived)

You can guess what happened next.
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:33,
archived)

don't get me wrong, i'm not a dunce - I'm just not good at English
( ,
Wed 14 Jan 2009, 14:03,
archived)