something is definitely missing
From the Invisible Extras challenge. See all 778 entries (closed)
( , Thu 12 Feb 2009, 21:17, archived)
s4.b3ta.com/host/creative/55730/1234434949/john.jpg
and a tip of the hat to the b3tan who excellently reversed the process we see above. name, anyone?
God edit: Clearly not work safe.
and a tip of the hat to the b3tan who excellently reversed the process we see above. name, anyone?
God edit: Clearly not work safe.
From the Invisible Extras challenge. See all 778 entries (closed)
( , Thu 12 Feb 2009, 21:17, archived)
2 nude people? possibly
I just would rather not have to look at Yoko Ono's black pudding & 2 fried eggs every time I refresh
( ,
Thu 12 Feb 2009, 21:21,
archived)
They truly are the most
unfortunate pair of pop udders ever exposed.
( ,
Thu 12 Feb 2009, 21:23,
archived)
I blame the meedja
for giving us false expectations of what breasts should look like.
mine, for example, are like two cow tongues.
( ,
Thu 12 Feb 2009, 21:25,
archived)
mine, for example, are like two cow tongues.
no but they can latch onto a proffered tuft of grass...
...with surprising dexterity
( ,
Thu 12 Feb 2009, 21:30,
archived)
I'm too much of a coward
plus the mouse pointer in pshop simply won't go into the shape of a caressing hand.
( ,
Thu 12 Feb 2009, 21:22,
archived)
ah well...these things happen
i got to stare at a kitten for an hour :)
( ,
Thu 12 Feb 2009, 23:56,
archived)
Sorry about that,
yet again I do think they need to decide some actual rules rather than just relying in the individual Mod's tastes...
( ,
Fri 13 Feb 2009, 0:59,
archived)
no worries! unfortunately even the BBFC struggles sometimes
I always go by the rule that if it could be seen as titillating (erotic poses etc) or shocking (as in beheadings, goatse etc) I'll leave it out. Although there was probably too much flesh and bush in that one, I thought it was famous enough and "adam and eve" enough to be safe.
cheers etc. :-)
( ,
Fri 13 Feb 2009, 1:22,
archived)
cheers etc. :-)